public-html@w3.org from February 2008 by date

Friday, 29 February 2008

• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Julian Reschke
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Roy T. Fielding
• Re: several messages about Unicode details in HTML Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages about serialising HTML and related subjects Ian Hickson
• Re: Marking Up Poetry Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Ian Hickson
• RE: several messages about handling encodings in HTML Brian Smith
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Julian Reschke
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Boris Zbarsky
• RE: BOM (several messages about handling encodings in HTML) Brian Smith
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Julian Reschke
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML James Graham
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Julian Reschke
• Re: several messages about serialising HTML and related subjects Simon Pieters
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: several messages about handling encodings in HTML Geoffrey Sneddon
• SMIL Timesheets and CURIE review Chris Wilson
• Re: Marking Up Poetry Sam Kuper
• Re: several messages about handling encodings in HTML Krzysztof Żelechowski
• RE: several messages about handling encodings in HTML Brian Smith
• RE: Unicode error handling (was several messages about handling encodings in HTML) Brian Smith
• RE: BOM (several messages about handling encodings in HTML) Brian Smith
• Re: Marking Up Poetry Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Anne van Kesteren
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Julian Reschke
• Re: several messages about content sniffing in HTML Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages about serialising HTML and related subjects Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages about handling encodings in HTML Ian Hickson

Thursday, 28 February 2008

• HTML WG telecon today cancelled Chris Wilson
• Re: Marking Up Poetry Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Marking Up Poetry Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Marking Up Poetry Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Trailing slash in doctype Simon Pieters
• Re: Type conversion in the Database API in 4.11 Kornel Lesiński
• Type conversion in the Database API in 4.11 mikko.honkala@nokia.com
• Re: Marking Up Poetry Peter Krantz
• Re: Marking Up Poetry Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Forms TF Process Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Marking Up Poetry (Was: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD) Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: Marking Up Poetry (Was: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD) Peter Krantz
• Re: Marking Up Poetry (Was: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD) Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: Marking Up Poetry (Was: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD) Smylers
• Doctype usage data Philip Taylor

Wednesday, 27 February 2008

• Re: Marking Up Poetry (Was: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD) Smylers
• Re: Clarify what it means for the system identifier to be missing Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Clarify what it means for the system identifier to be missing Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: Clarify what it means for the system identifier to be missing Anne van Kesteren
• Clarify what it means for the system identifier to be missing Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: Implicit sections (was: Re: several messages about <section>, <p>, <hr>, and related subjects) Ian Hickson
• Re: acceptance: how Dan Connolly
• Parsing: <applet>, scoping element or not Simon Pieters
• Re: Trailing slash in doctype David Hyatt
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Leif Halvard Silli
• Trailing slash in doctype Philip Taylor
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Editorial: inline vs. text-level vs. phrasing (was: Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD) Simon Pieters
• Implicit sections (was: Re: several messages about <section>, <p>, <hr>, and related subjects) Simon Pieters
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Ian Hickson
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Lachlan Hunt
• Re: several messages about <section>, <p>, <hr>, and related subjects Karl Dubost
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages about <section>, <p>, <hr>, and related subjects Ian Hickson
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: several messages about <ol>, <ul>, <dl>, and related subjects David Latapie

Tuesday, 26 February 2008

• Re: several messages about <ol>, <ul>, <dl>, and related subjects Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages about <ol>, <ul>, <dl>, and related subjects David Latapie
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Ian Hickson
• Editorial issues on <ol reversed> (was: Re: several messages about <ol>, <ul>, <dl>, and related subjects) Simon Pieters
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: several messages about <figure> and related subjects Charles McCathieNevile
• Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD Lachlan Hunt
• Re[2]: acceptance: how Dmitry Turin
• Re: several messages about <figure> and related subjects Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: several messages about <ol>, <ul>, <dl>, and related subjects Ian Hickson

Monday, 25 February 2008

• Re: several messages about <figure> and related subjects Ian Hickson

Sunday, 24 February 2008

• Re: Suggested research item: Java applet embedding patterns Henri Sivonen
• Suggested research item: Java applet embedding patterns Henri Sivonen
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Steve Axthelm

Saturday, 23 February 2008

• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• Re: Validation error frequencies Laurens Holst

Friday, 22 February 2008

• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Michael A. Puls II
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• RE: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Justin James
• Re: several messages about <event-source> and related subjects Ian Hickson

Thursday, 21 February 2008

• RE: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Justin James

Friday, 22 February 2008

• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper

Thursday, 21 February 2008

• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Marghanita da Cruz
• Re: several messages about <address> and related subjects Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-35 (aria-processing): Need to define processing requirements for aria states and properties when used in html [HTML 5 spec] Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-35 (aria-processing): Need to define processing requirements for aria states and properties when used in html [HTML 5 spec] James Graham
• Re: ISSUE-35 (aria-processing): Need to define processing requirements for aria states and properties when used in html [HTML 5 spec] Simon Pieters
• Re: ISSUE-35 (aria-processing): Need to define processing requirements for aria states and properties when used in html [HTML 5 spec] Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: acceptance: how Dan Connolly
• Re: cite element not for people's names? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Henri Sivonen
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 20 February 2008

• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Jeff Schiller
• RE: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Jake Liddell
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Philip TAYLOR
• Re: [WF2] HTMLFormElement.accept vs. function accept(){} Jon Barnett
• Re: [WF2] HTMLFormElement.accept vs. function accept(){} Jon Barnett
• Re: [WF2] HTMLFormElement.accept vs. function accept(){} Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Jeff Schiller
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Philip TAYLOR
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? Karl Groves
• Re: [WF2] HTMLFormElement.accept vs. function accept(){} Simon Pieters
• Re: [WF2] HTMLFormElement.accept vs. function accept(){} liorean
• [WF2] HTMLFormElement.accept vs. function accept(){} Simon Pieters

Tuesday, 19 February 2008

• RE: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Jake Liddell

Wednesday, 20 February 2008

• Re: cite element not for people's names? Karl Dubost
• Re: cite element not for people's names? James Graham
• Re: cite element not for people's names? Karl Dubost
• Re: cite element not for people's names? Karl Dubost
• Re: cite element not for people's names? James Graham
• cite element not for people's names? Ben Boyle

Tuesday, 19 February 2008

• Re: SQL subset definition ( 4.11. Client-side database storage ) Anne van Kesteren
• ISSUE-36 (client-side-storage-sql): Client side database storage SQL statement support [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Protocol for submitting reviews of HTML5 recommendation? Ben Boyle
• Re: Protocol for submitting reviews of HTML5 recommendation? Ben Boyle
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Smylers
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Thomas Broyer
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper

Monday, 18 February 2008

• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Marghanita da Cruz
• Re: **off list** Would the arai describedby property be a suitable replacement for or improvement on @longdesc? Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: **off list** Would the arai describedby property be a suitable replacement for or improvement on @longdesc? Anne van Kesteren
• **off list** Would the arai describedby property be a suitable replacement for or improvement on @longdesc? Joshue O Connor
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Joshue O Connor
• Re: Would the arai describedby property be a suitable replacement for or improvement on @longdesc? Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: Protocol for submitting reviews of HTML5 recommendation? Karl Dubost
• Re: Protocol for submitting reviews of HTML5 recommendation? Anne van Kesteren
• Protocol for submitting reviews of HTML5 recommendation? Karl Groves
• SQL subset definition ( 4.11. Client-side database storage ) mikko.honkala@nokia.com
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Would the arai describedby property be a suitable replacement for or improvement on @longdesc? James Graham
• Re: ISSUE-35 (aria-processing): Need to define processing requirements for aria states and properties when used in html [HTML 5 spec] mtanalin@yandex.ru
• ISSUE-35 (aria-processing): Need to define processing requirements for aria states and properties when used in html [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Joshue O Connor
• Re: Would the arai describedby property be a suitable replacement for or improvement on @longdesc? Joshue O Connor
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Joshue O Connor
• Re: Forms TF Process Mark Birbeck
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: Integrating aria into HTML 5 [was: Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary] Steven Faulkner
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Charles McCathieNevile
• Integrating aria into HTML 5 [was: Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary] James Graham
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Thomas Broyer
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Forms TF Process Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 17 February 2008

• Re: Comments on drag and drop Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Daniel

Friday, 15 February 2008

• RE: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") David Randall

Sunday, 17 February 2008

• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Daniel Schattenkirchner
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Henri Sivonen
• Re: contradictory example of b Daniel Schattenkirchner
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Daniel Schattenkirchner
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Karl Groves
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Michael A. Puls II
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Dylan Smith

Saturday, 16 February 2008

• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Sam Kuper
• Re: Forms TF Process Mark Birbeck
• contradictory example of b Ben Boyle
• Re: [Reminder]: SMIL Timesheets 1.0 Last Call Transition Announcement Marghanita da Cruz
• Re: Detailed review of 4.1. Browsing contexts and 4.3. Session history and navigation Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? James Graham

Friday, 15 February 2008

• ACTION-44 - HTML Issue Tracking Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? Boris Zbarsky
• Tree construction: Ambiguity in "process the token as if the insertion mode was ..." Philip Taylor
• Forms TF Process Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? Karl Groves
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? Karl Groves
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? James Graham
• Access Control for Cross-site Requests WD Published Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? James Graham
• Re: acceptance: how Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Investigate expected results to http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/http/content-type/sniffing/ tests in collaboration with the IETF HTTP WG (ACTION-44) Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Jens Meiert
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") j.j.
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Jens Meiert
• Re: ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? Ben Boyle
• Re: [Reminder]: SMIL Timesheets 1.0 Last Call Transition Announcement Thierry Michel
• Re: proposals into HTML5 L. David Baron
• acceptance: how Dmitry Turin
• ISSUE-34 (commonality): Can we get access to tools that determine how often markup is used on the web? HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Comments on drag and drop Ian Hickson

Thursday, 14 February 2008

• Adoption agency terminology Philip Taylor
• Re: [Reminder]: SMIL Timesheets 1.0 Last Call Transition Announcement Marghanita da Cruz
• Re: agenda: HTML WG weekly 14 Feb (Valentine's Day edition) Dan Connolly
• Re: [Reminder]: SMIL Timesheets 1.0 Last Call Transition Announcement Dick Bulterman
• Re: [Reminder]: SMIL Timesheets 1.0 Last Call Transition Announcement Bert Bos
• Re6: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Glenn A. Bookout
• Re: several messages about radial gradients Philip Taylor
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL etc. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL etc. Harry Halpin
• Re: let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL etc. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL etc. Julian Reschke
• Re: let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL etc. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL etc. Arthur Jennings
• [Reminder]: SMIL Timesheets 1.0 Last Call Transition Announcement Thierry Michel
• Re: several messages about radial gradients Ian Hickson
• Re: Permitted slash not defined in terms of void elements (part of my detailed review of the tokenization section) Ian Hickson
• Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Ian Hickson
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Jeff Schiller
• Draft W3C TAG Finding "Passwords in the Clear" available for review David Orchard
• IFRAME - @name should be allowed Michael A. Puls II

Wednesday, 13 February 2008

• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Marghanita da Cruz
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Kornel Lesinski
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Jeff Schiller
• Re: Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Thomas Broyer
• Why authors are using Transitional (and target="_blank") Simon Pieters
• Re[2]: proposals into HTML5 Dmitry Turin
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Ben Boyle
• Re: proposals into HTML5 Thomas Broyer
• proposals into HTML5 Dmitry Turin
• Re: Visual-components support in HTML by default? Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Visual-components support in HTML by default? Chris Adams

Tuesday, 12 February 2008

• Visual-components support in HTML by default? Pavel Perna

Wednesday, 13 February 2008

• Re: DogFood Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 12 February 2008

• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Ian Hickson
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Philip Taylor
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Julian Reschke
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Kornel Lesinski
• Re: several messages about radial gradients Boris Zbarsky
• Re: several messages about radial gradients Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages about radial gradients Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Design Principle "Priority of Constituencies", was: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Ian Hickson
• Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage Ian Hickson
• Re: Design Principle "Priority of Constituencies", was: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? James Graham
• ISSUE-33 (ping-referer): spec requires non-compliant Referer header [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Julian Reschke
• Design Principle "Priority of Constituencies", was: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Julian Reschke
• Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage Anne van Kesteren
• Re: rel="contact" Ryan King
• Re: rel="contact" Matthew Raymond
• Re: Validation error frequencies j.j.
• Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage Ian Hickson

Monday, 11 February 2008

• Re: Validation error frequencies Kornel Lesinski
• RE: Adoption agency in foster parented content Chris Wilson
• Re: Adoption agency in foster parented content Simon Pieters
• Re: Adoption agency in foster parented content Boris Zbarsky
• RE: Adoption agency in foster parented content Chris Wilson
• Re: Validation error frequencies Henri Sivonen
• Re: Validation error frequencies Henri Sivonen
• Re: Validation error frequencies Henri Sivonen
• Adoption agency in foster parented content Philip Taylor
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Ian Hickson

Sunday, 10 February 2008

• Review of the 3.16 section and the HTMLInputElement interface Samuel Santos
• Re: <canvas> origin-clean flag Ian Hickson
• [suggestion] priority for loading elements stefan2904
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Julian Reschke
• Re: Comments on "origin" (data: and image) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: The canvas element (detailed review) Ian Hickson
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• <table><select><td> parsing Philip Taylor
• Re: Comments on "origin" (data: and image) Ian Hickson
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: several messages about radial gradients Ian Hickson
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Ian Hickson

Saturday, 9 February 2008

• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Parsing: <style> and <script> in <table> Simon Pieters
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Julian Reschke
• Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage Mihai Sucan
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Julian Reschke
• Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage Ian Hickson
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Ben Boyle
• Re: key/value-based storage comments Ian Hickson
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Ian Hickson

Friday, 8 February 2008

• table model: Width of colgroup defined by col elements James Graham
• rel="contact" Ryan King
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Ian Hickson
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Lee Kowalkowski
• Coalescing characters in Text nodes Philip Taylor
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Ben Boyle
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki

Thursday, 7 February 2008

• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• ISSUE-32 (table-summary): Include a summary attribute for tables? [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Smylers
• Retention of @summary for Table Element Joshue O Connor
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Chasen Le Hara
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Investigate expected results to http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/http/content-type/sniffing/ tests in collaboration with the IETF HTTP WG (ACTION-44) Julian Reschke
• Re: Investigate expected results to http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/http/content-type/sniffing/ tests in collaboration with the IETF HTTP WG (ACTION-44) Thomas Broyer
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Smylers
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Thomas Broyer
• Re: Investigate expected results to http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/http/content-type/sniffing/ tests in collaboration with the IETF HTTP WG (ACTION-44) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Investigate expected results to http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/http/content-type/sniffing/ tests in collaboration with the IETF HTTP WG (ACTION-44) Smylers
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Investigate expected results to http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/http/content-type/sniffing/ tests in collaboration with the IETF HTTP WG (ACTION-44) Julian Reschke
• ISSUE-31 (missing-alt): Should img without alt ever be conforming [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re[6]: server's initiative Dmitry Turin
• Re: Investigate expected results to http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/http/content-type/sniffing/ tests in collaboration with the IETF HTTP WG (ACTION-44) Smylers
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of Omitting alt Attribute for Critical Content Steven Faulkner
• Investigate expected results to http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/http/content-type/sniffing/ tests in collaboration with the IETF HTTP WG (ACTION-44) Julian Reschke
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Jeff Schiller
• Re: Re[4]: server's initiative Anne van Kesteren
• Re[4]: server's initiative Dmitry Turin
• Re: server's initiative Anne van Kesteren
• Re[2]: server's initiative Dmitry Turin
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Chasen Le Hara
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Samuel Santos

Wednesday, 6 February 2008

• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of Omitting alt Attribute for Critical Content Laura Carlson
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE j.j.
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Rimantas Liubertas
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of Omitting alt Attribute for Critical Content Al Gilman
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki
• Re: ISSUE-30 longdesc Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-30 longdesc Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation... James Graham
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE j.j.
• Fw: Validation error frequencies Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• RE: longdesc Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation... stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com
• Re: longdesc Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation... Joshue O Connor
• Re: longdesc Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ISSUE-30 longdesc Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Emphasizing STRIKE gonchuki
• RE: longdesc Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation... stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com
• Re: ISSUE-30 longdesc Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation... James Graham
• ISSUE-30 (longdesc): Should HTML 5 include a longdesc attribute for images [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Validation error frequencies (target="_new") Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Validation error frequencies (target="_new") j.j.
• Emphasizing STRIKE Leif Halvard Silli
• longdesc Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: HTML vs XHTML issue Leif Halvard Silli

Tuesday, 5 February 2008

• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Joshue O Connor
• Re: Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Ian Hickson
• Clarification of rational for deprecation of @longdesc and @summary Joshue O Connor
• Re: server's initiative Anne van Kesteren
• Re[2+]: server's initiative Dmitry Turin
• Re: Validation error frequencies (target="_new") Simon Pieters
• Re: server's initiative Anne van Kesteren
• Re[2+]: server's initiative Dmitry Turin
• Re[2]: server's initiative Dmitry Turin
• Re: server's initiative Anne van Kesteren
• server's initiative Dmitry Turin

Monday, 4 February 2008

• Re: Validation error frequencies (target="_new") Philip Taylor
• Re: Validation error frequencies (target="_new") j.j.
• Tree construction: In-body li/dd/dt element insertion Philip Taylor
• ping attribute (ISSUE-1, ISSUE-2) Julian Reschke
• Re: Validation error frequencies Henri Sivonen
• Re: Validation error frequencies in Alexa top 500 front pages Henri Sivonen
• Re: Validation error frequencies Henri Sivonen
• Re: Validation error frequencies in Alexa top 500 front pages Henri Sivonen

Sunday, 3 February 2008

• Re: Unmatched quotes for attributes (was: Re: Spaces in IRIs) Simon Pieters
• Re: Validation error frequencies Sam Ruby
• Unmatched quotes for attributes (was: Re: Spaces in IRIs) Simon Pieters
• Re: Validation error frequencies Henri Sivonen
• Validation error frequencies in Alexa top 500 front pages Henri Sivonen
• Re: Validation error frequencies Laurens Holst
• <canvas> origin-clean flag Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spaces in IRIs Philip Taylor
• Re: Validation error frequencies Michael A. Puls II
• Re: Validation error frequencies Sam Ruby
• Re: Spaces in IRIs Sam Ruby

Saturday, 2 February 2008

• Re: The canvas element (detailed review) Philip Taylor
• Re: Validation error frequencies Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: Validation error frequencies Henri Sivonen
• Re: Spaces in IRIs Henri Sivonen
• Re: Validation error frequencies Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: Spaces in IRIs Philip Taylor
• Comments on "origin" (data: and image) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Julian Reschke

Friday, 1 February 2008

• html validation error Eli Shemer

Saturday, 2 February 2008

• Re: Suggested wording improvements for <i> and <b> sections Ben Boyle
• Re: Spaces in IRIs Sam Ruby
• Re: Canvas path transformations Ian Hickson
• Re: Ampersands in attribute values (was: Re: Validation error frequencies) Simon Pieters
• Ampersands in attribute values (was: Re: Validation error frequencies) Anne van Kesteren
• Spaces in IRIs (was: Re: Validation error frequencies) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Kornel Lesinski

Friday, 1 February 2008

• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Julian Reschke
• Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with <a ping>? Kornel Lesinski
• Re: Suggested wording improvements for <i> and <b> sections Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Suggested wording improvements for <i> and <b> sections Richard Ishida
• Meta charset syntax Henri Sivonen
• Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element Mihai Sucan
• Re: several messages about radial gradients Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Validation error frequencies Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: several messages about radial gradients Ian Hickson
• Re: Canvas gradients should not be optional Ian Hickson
• Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element Ian Hickson
• Re: The canvas element (detailed review) Ian Hickson
• Re: Validation error frequencies Simon Pieters
• Re: Validation error frequencies Kornel Lesinski

Last message date: Friday, 29 February 2008 23:56:32 UTC