Wednesday, 30 April 2008
- Fw: WCAG 2.0 CR - W3C blog post and press release
- Number of error when EOF inside 'SYSTEM' or 'PUBLIC'
- IE and document.write [was: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML]
- IE8 parsing and xmlns [was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics]
- Canvas ImageData comments
Tuesday, 29 April 2008
- Re: <font> and style="" in HTML5
- <font> and style="" in HTML5
- Re: Comments on "origin" (data: and image)
- RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: [whatwg] text/html for html and xhtml
Monday, 28 April 2008
- RE: [whatwg] text/html for html and xhtml
- XMLHttpRequest last call! comments due 2 June
- Re: postMessage feedback
- RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: HTML semantics and file system
- HTML semantics and file system
- RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
Sunday, 27 April 2008
- Re: EOF in new tokenizer states
- RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax
- EOF in new tokenizer states
- Canvas arcTo comments
- Re: postMessage feedback
- Canvas arc comments
Saturday, 26 April 2008
Sunday, 27 April 2008
Saturday, 26 April 2008
- Re: [whatwg] postMessage feedback
- Re: postMessage feedback
- Re: postMessage feedback
- Re: Nested forms
- Canvas shadows should not be optional
- Re: Opera, VoiceOver and alt (was: One more thought...)
Friday, 25 April 2008
- RE: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: MathML entities don't degrade gracefully
- Re: MathML entities don't degrade gracefully
- Re: MathML entities don't degrade gracefully
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable
- Opera, VoiceOver and alt (was: One more thought...)
Thursday, 24 April 2008
Wednesday, 23 April 2008
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
Thursday, 24 April 2008
- Re: MathML entities don't degrade gracefully
- Re: tabindex="" feedback
- RE: tabindex="" feedback
- MathML entities don't degrade gracefully
- Re: Nested forms
- tabindex="" feedback
- Re: <td scope> and <td> using headers+id> as Table Headers
- Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
- Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
- Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
- Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
- Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
Wednesday, 23 April 2008
- Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
- Authoring requirements and default values with progress and meter
- Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
- Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
- Re: <td scope> and <td> using headers+id> as Table Headers
- <td scope> and <td> using headers+id> as Table Headers
- Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
- Re: Nested forms
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
- Re: Nested forms
- Re: Numbers and units (was Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references)
- Numbers and units (was Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references)
- Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
- Nested forms
- Re: Markup for names
- Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about quotations
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing
Tuesday, 22 April 2008
- Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007)
- Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007)
- RE: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007)
- Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007)
- Re: Collecting of data about alt usage
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes
- required radio buttons and checkboxes
- Re: meta content-language
- Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
Monday, 21 April 2008
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Browser defaults should please the mass of authors
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
Sunday, 20 April 2008
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
Saturday, 19 April 2008
- RE: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations
- Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text)
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
Friday, 18 April 2008
- Re: Collecting of data about alt usage
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Re: [html4all] Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Re: [html4all] Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Re: Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Image Report feature in Validator.nu
- Parsing: [R]CDATA algorithm lacks namespace
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics)
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: alt and authoring practices and validation behaviour
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics)
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations
Thursday, 17 April 2008
- Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations
- Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations
- Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations
- Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations
- Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations
- Re: reality check (was: Re: The ins and del elements and comments thereon)
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: meta content-language
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: testing the theory that required alt = bad
- Re: testing the theory that required alt = bad
- reality check (was: Re: The ins and del elements and comments thereon)
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- testing the theory that required alt = bad
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- new variant proposal on alt=? issues
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- meta content-language
- Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations
- The ins and del elements and comments thereon
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics)
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics)
Wednesday, 16 April 2008
Thursday, 17 April 2008
- Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics)
- text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics)
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
Wednesday, 16 April 2008
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image?
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- More effective approaches? (was RE: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools)
- Is this an accurate reflection of where we stand today? (was RE: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft))
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: several messages about alt
- RE: alt and authoring practices
- alt and authoring practices
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image?
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image?
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image?
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: [html4all] On HTML WG process - was [Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools]
- Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: alt and authoring practices
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- alt and authoring practices
- "Social engineering" Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value ...
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image?
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable
- On HTML WG process - was [Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools]
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Markup for names
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Markup for names
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
Tuesday, 15 April 2008
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5
- RE: The Philosophy of @alt (was [html4all] several messages about alt)
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Collecting of data about alt usage
- Markup for names
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects
- there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt]
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Effect of bogus lang on determining natural language
- Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects)
- Re: SVG in text/html
- Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
- Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image?
- SVG in text/html
- Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects)
- Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects)
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects)
- Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects)
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects
- Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects
Monday, 14 April 2008
- RE: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image?
- Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking
- Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: validity and other important things
- Re: validity and other important things
- Re: Point of clarification in alt debate(s)
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences
- Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- RE: Point of clarification in alt debate(s)
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
Sunday, 13 April 2008
- Re: Point of clarification in alt debate(s)
- Point of clarification in alt debate(s)
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text.
- Re: [html4all] several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: several messages about alt
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
Saturday, 12 April 2008
- Re: [whatwg] several messages about quotations
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: [html4all] Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec.
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: several messages about quotations
Friday, 11 April 2008
- Re: UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences
- Re: UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences
- Re: UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences
- UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative
- Re: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative
- Re: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative
- Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- Re: rendering of control characters, was:: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: Unicode error handling (was several messages about handling encodings in HTML)
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- Re: validity and other important things
- Re: rendering of control characters, was:: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: process Re: omitting alt: closing an open ...
- process Re: omitting alt: closing an open ...
- Re: rendering of control characters, was:: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- rendering of control characters, was:: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Whose problem Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: validity and other important things Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- validity and other important things Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: SVG in HTML Review Comments
- Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
- omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress
Thursday, 10 April 2008
- refined list of HTML WG open issues
- Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute
- xml:lang attribute in HTML documents
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Parsing: <h4> in foreign content
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
- "in foreign content": end-of-file token
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics
Tuesday, 8 April 2008
Thursday, 10 April 2008
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Event listener confusion
- Re: Event listener confusion
- Event listener confusion
- SVG in HTML Review Comments
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
Wednesday, 9 April 2008
- Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
- Re: Unicode error handling (was several messages about handling encodings in HTML)
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration
Tuesday, 8 April 2008
Monday, 7 April 2008
- RE: Unicode error handling (was several messages about handling encodings in HTML)
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
Sunday, 6 April 2008
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Parsing: CDATA section processing
- Re: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
Saturday, 5 April 2008
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Syntax: omitting <html> when it's followed by whitespace
- Re: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- xmlns talisman on HTML fragments in SVG/MathML
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
Friday, 4 April 2008
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Parsing: <noframes> before <frameset>
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
Thursday, 3 April 2008
Friday, 4 April 2008
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- XML in HTML back 10 years ago
- Re: Extensibility vs. supporting SVG and MathML
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: Extensibility vs. supporting SVG and MathML
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: In body other end tag handling convoluted to get at most one error
- In body other end tag handling convoluted to get at most one error
- Re: Extensibility vs. supporting SVG and MathML
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Extensibility vs. supporting SVG and MathML
- make that issue-38.. [was: Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5]
- ISSUE-40 (style-attr-vs-css): Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5 [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5
- ISSUE-39 (style-attr-vs-css): Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5 [HTML 5 spec]
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: Conway's Law [was: Point of Extensibility]
- Conway's Law [was: Point of Extensibility]
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
Thursday, 3 April 2008
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- {minutes} 2008-04-03 HTML WG telcon
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (ISSUE-37 html-svg-mathml)
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Rename 'irrelevant' to 'hidden'?
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
Wednesday, 2 April 2008
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Please add rel="timesheet"
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- new post: Research Assistant/ Research Fellow in Online Community Building and Web 2.0 for the Medicines Support Unit for Optometrists: Closing Date: 18 April 2008
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: The mapping of phi
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: The mapping of phi
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: The mapping of phi
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- RE: The mapping of phi
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: The mapping of phi
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: parsing html, xhtml, xml (svg and mathml) serialisations into a DOM
- Re: parsing html, xhtml, xml (svg and mathml) serialisations into a DOM
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- parsing html, xhtml, xml (svg and mathml) serialisations into a DOM
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: <anytag xml:size=10000>cvpwrbdvw</anytag>
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: <anytag xml:size=10000>cvpwrbdvw</anytag>
Tuesday, 1 April 2008
Wednesday, 2 April 2008
- Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
- Re: The mapping of phi (was: Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html
Tuesday, 1 April 2008
- Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- RE: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: HTML/MathML integration
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- RE: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- RE: HTML/MathML integration
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Re: HTML/MathML integration
- Re: Point of Extensibility
- Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: HTML/MathML integration
- Point of Extensibility (was: An observation on the MathML discussion, was: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML, was: SVG in text/html, was: Point of Extensibility)
- Re: HTML/MathML integration
- Re: HTML/MathML integration
- Re: HTML/MathML integration
- Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- HTML/MathML integration
- RE: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- An observation on the MathML discussion, was: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- RE: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- Re: <semantics> (was Exploring new vocabularies for HTML)
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- RE: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML
- Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML