Saturday, 31 March 2007
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: RichTextInput03
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: Adding attributes to elements Generically (was Let every element have a src attribute)
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Re: E-mail subscription and RSS
- Re: Posting to this list
Friday, 30 March 2007
Saturday, 31 March 2007
- Re: Versioning information
- "HTML Email" W3C Workshop
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Versioning information (was: Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5)
- Comments on XForms Transitional
- Re: Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
Friday, 30 March 2007
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Current Status related to WHATWG (was Multipart response support and other new features)
- Re: Scope of this group
- RE: Brainstorming: more structured form submissions
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Re: Posting to this list (handling duplicates)
- Re: Posting to this list (handling duplicates)
- Re: Scope of this group
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: Posting to this list
- Scope of this group
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: FW:Re: Multipart response support
- FW:Re: Multipart response support
- RE:Re: Multipart response support
- Current Status related to WHATWG (was Multipart response support and other new features)
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Metadata Authoring Capabilities
- Re: Metadata Authoring Capabilities
- Metadata Authoring Capabilities
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- apologies for multiple posts of identical message
- Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
- Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
- Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
- Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
- Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Re: Brainstorming: more structured form submissions
- Re: Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
Thursday, 29 March 2007
- Brainstorming: more structured form submissions
- RE:Re: Multipart response support
- RE:Re: RichTextInput03
Friday, 30 March 2007
- Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
- Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
- Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
- Microsoft's involvement in the WG
- Re: Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
Thursday, 29 March 2007
- Re: Use Visible Metadata was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Multipart response support (and other new features)
- Re: Use Visible Metadata was Re: Design Principles
- Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Design Principles Document update
- Design Principles Document update
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
- Re: RichTextInput03
- Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Multipart response support
- Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: VisibleMetadata
- Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
- Re: RichTextInput03
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute
- Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
- Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
- Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
- Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
- Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
- Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: <video> element feedback
- Re: RichTextInput03
- Re: <video> element feedback
- Re: <video> element feedback
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- AbbrAcronym01: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
- Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
- Adding attributes to elements Generically (was Let every element have a src attribute)
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: RichTextInput03
- <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: Multipart response support
- Let every element have a src attribute
- Re: <video> element feedback
- Re: <video> element feedback
- Re: Glossary of English Terms
- Re: RichTextInput03
- Re: RichTextInput03
- Glossary of English Terms
- Re: RichTextInput03
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
- Use Visible Metadata was Re: Design Principles
- Re: Multipart response support
- more clear survey announcements [was: let's have an HTML WG teleconference ...]
- Re: cancel. Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: cancel. Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- cancel. Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: VisibleMetadata
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: VisibleMetadata
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: VisibleMetadata
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: Multipart response support
- Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
- Multipart response support
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: VisibleMetadata
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: wow...
- Re: DocType02: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: SPAM-LOW: story telling and test cases
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: VisibleMetadata
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
- Re: story telling and test cases
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: RichTextInput03
- Re: WG Process
- Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
- WG Process (was: Re: wow...)
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: VisibleMetadata
- MostlySemanticMarkup
- Re: wow...
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
- Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
- Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- Re: RichTextInput03
- update from Chris Wilson on Microsoft's status
- Re: RichTextInput03
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
- Proposed Design Principles
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: XML input control
- RE: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: story telling and test cases
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Test case, XML input control
- RE: People's Location in the HTML WG
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RE: declarative expressons in WF2
- RE: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- People's Location in the HTML WG
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- story telling and test cases
- Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: wow...
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RichTextInput03: Rich text input control (was: XML input control)
- DocType02: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- AbbrAcronym01: Was Deprecate <acronym>
- RE: XML input control
- RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
Monday, 26 March 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Fwd: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Monday, 26 March 2007
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: XML input control
- Re: wow...
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
- RE: Brainstorming: Best of All Worlds
- changing the email address connected to your HTML WG membership [was: Hello everybody]
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Rich text input control (was: XML input control)
Monday, 26 March 2007
- RE: declarative expressons in WF2
- Rich text input control (was: XML input control)
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- RE: declarative expressons in WF2
- RE: declarative expressons in WF2
- Printing a review copy of Web Apps 1.0
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: HTML should be replaced by Flash
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RE: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: XML input control
- Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- Re: pronunciation and other guides RE: Deprecate <accronym>
- RE: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: wow...
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: XML input control
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RE: XML input control
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: XML input control
- Re: XML input control
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: XML input control
- HTML should be replaced by Flash
- Re: XML input control
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: W3C tools
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
- Re: W3C tools
- Re: W3C tools
- Re: wow...
- wow...
- RE: W3C tools Re: Named & Numbered Issues was: Leading ... IRC
- RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading theForefront - with IRC ! ?)
- RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
- Re: brainstorming -- SVG -- SMIL-like declarations in HTML
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- RE: brainstorming -- SVG -- SMIL-like declarations in HTML
- Re: W3C tools
Sunday, 25 March 2007
- Re: W3C tools
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- RE: declarative expressons in WF2
- W3C tools Re: Named & Numbered Issues was: Leading ... IRC
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- RE: alternative guides to content (semantic, visual, but not pronunciation)
- Re: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
- RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: WF2 step attribute
- Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- Re: WF2 step attribute
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- RE: brainstorming -- SVG
- Re: pronunciation and other guides RE: Deprecate <accronym>
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: WF2 step attribute
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- WF2 step attribute
- Re: declarative expressons in WF2
- declarative expressons in WF2
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- pronunciation and other guides RE: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RE: brainstorming -- SVG
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
Saturday, 24 March 2007
Sunday, 25 March 2007
Saturday, 24 March 2007
Sunday, 25 March 2007
Saturday, 24 March 2007
Sunday, 25 March 2007
- Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- RE: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
Saturday, 24 March 2007
- Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
Friday, 23 March 2007
- Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (fwd)
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
Saturday, 24 March 2007
- let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: WorkGroup Funding - re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
Friday, 23 March 2007
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Meeting at XTech (was: Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG)
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: brainstorming -- SVG
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (multi-site/video possibilities)
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: brainstorming -- SVG
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Deprecate <acronym>
- Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: XML input control
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- Re: No normative schema
- Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
- No normative schema (was: Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG)
- Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
- Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Colours on the WG home page
- Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
- Re: brainstorming -- SVG
- Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
- Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- RE: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
- RE: brainstorming -- SVG
- RE: Brainstorming - abbreviations -- usage statistics
- brainstorming -- SVG
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
- Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Colours on the WG home page
Thursday, 22 March 2007
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- presentation to IETF in Chicago July 22-27? [Fwd: new W3C HTML WG]
- toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
- Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- XML input control
- Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Straw man proposal to build an agenda/issue list
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- RE: Colours on the WG home page
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
- Re: Colours on the WG home page
- Straw man proposal to build an agenda/issue list
- Re: HTML WG office hours in IRC, a few wiki topics
- Re: HTML WG office hours in IRC, a few wiki topics
- Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
Wednesday, 21 March 2007
- Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- WorkGroup Funding - re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
- Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: <video> element feedback
- Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: <video> element feedback
- Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
- Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
- Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
- HTML WG office hours in IRC, a few wiki topics
- Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
- RE: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
- Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
- Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
- Re: <video> element feedback
- Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
- preference for blocks of unrelated comments
Tuesday, 20 March 2007
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: <video> element feedback
- Re: <video> element feedback
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Fwd: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Affiliation disclosure
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
Monday, 19 March 2007
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: So, I am reading all these interesting threads...
- Re: So, I am reading all these interesting threads...
- So, I am reading all these interesting threads...
- RE: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- IMG WIDTH/HEIGHT attributes (was: [whatwg] Video proposals)
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
Sunday, 18 March 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Fwd: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
Saturday, 17 March 2007
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
- WYSIWYM editors
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
Friday, 16 March 2007
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details?
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Colours on the WG home page
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- RE: Whoah There, Turbo
Thursday, 15 March 2007
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
Friday, 16 March 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
- HTML_WG.init() (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
Thursday, 15 March 2007
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
- Brainstorming - abbreviations
- Re: Here's Web Forms 2.0 ...
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo (and market share threshold, and charter changes)
- Re: Regarding the Patent Policy
- Regarding the Patent Policy
- Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo (and market share threshold, and charter changes)
- Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
- Re: Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
- Re: HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details?
- Re: HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details?
- HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details?
- Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
- RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
Wednesday, 14 March 2007
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Best approach to research
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Hello everybody
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
Wednesday, 14 March 2007
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
- face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
- RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Hello, comments (was: Re: Whoah There, Turbo)
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Hello, comments (was: Re: Whoah There, Turbo)
Monday, 12 March 2007
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
- Whoah There, Turbo
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
- WG membership
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Posting to this list
Saturday, 10 March 2007
Friday, 9 March 2007
- Here's Web Forms 2.0 ...
- Meet the HTML Working Group chairs in Austin at SxSWi (QA Weblog)
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Posting to this list
Thursday, 8 March 2007
- Re: Posting to this list
- Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?
- Posting to this list
- Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?
- Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?
- Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?
- Re: [whatwg] call for participation: W3C HTML Working Group
- call for participation: W3C HTML Working Group