Monday, 31 December 2007
- Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
 - Re: Underline element.
 
Sunday, 30 December 2007
Saturday, 29 December 2007
- Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 
Friday, 28 December 2007
- Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 
Thursday, 27 December 2007
Friday, 28 December 2007
- Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
 - Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 
Thursday, 27 December 2007
- Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Re: Underline element.
 - Underline element.
 - Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
 - Re: HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
 - HTML 5 Tutorials and authoring Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
 - Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
 
Wednesday, 26 December 2007
Tuesday, 25 December 2007
Monday, 24 December 2007
- Decision Making (was: Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG)
 - Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
 - Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Commenting on Joe Clark's "They Shoot Standardistas, Don't They?"
 
Sunday, 23 December 2007
- Re: Progressive Implementation Report
 - Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
 
Saturday, 22 December 2007
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: Progressive Implementation Report
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Progressive Implementation Report (was: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development)
 - Re: <script> for non-script content
 
Friday, 21 December 2007
- Re: <script> for non-script content
 - <script> for non-script content
 - Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
 - Subject: [HDP] 3.1 Solve Real Problems
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: Reanimate <xmp>
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - {minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2007-12-20
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 
Thursday, 20 December 2007
- January 22 publication date [was: Transition and publication requests initiated for HTML5 FPWD]
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: New entities
 - Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
 
Wednesday, 19 December 2007
Thursday, 20 December 2007
Wednesday, 19 December 2007
- Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
 - Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
 - Re: Reserved keystrokes for borwsers and operating system functions
 - RE: Reserved keystrokes for borwsers and operating system functions
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
 - Re: An Overview of SMIL Timing and Media Attributes for Audio and Video Objects.
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
 - Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
 - Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
 - Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
 - Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
 - Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
 - Transition and publication requests initiated for HTML5 FPWD [was: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008]
 - Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
 - Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
 - Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
 - Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
 - Re: ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
 - ISSUE-19 html5-spec: HTML 5 specification release(s) due Feb 2008
 
Tuesday, 18 December 2007
- Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - news from the W3C Video Workshop: ISSUE-6 videoaudio, ISSUE-7 video-codecs
 - Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
 - Re: [whatwg] Acronyms & Abbreviations whatwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 90
 - Re: Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
 - Evaluating HTTP Methods in the Spec
 
Monday, 17 December 2007
Tuesday, 18 December 2007
- Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: [XHR] send doesn’t explain what to do when method is GET
 
Monday, 17 December 2007
- Re: Copypaste error in vague date parsing algorithm
 - Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 
Friday, 14 December 2007
- Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
 - Canvas gradients should not be optional
 - Re: [whatwg] Acronyms & Abbreviations whatwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 90
 - Re: [whatwg] Acronyms & Abbreviations whatwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 90
 - Re: ISSUE-15 immediate-mode-graphics proposal carries over objections
 
Thursday, 13 December 2007
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - junkmail
 - Re: [whatwg] Acronyms & Abbreviations whatwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 90
 - RE: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work
 - Restatement of the outline algorithm
 - [WF2] <form target> is not allowed
 - Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - 13 Dec HTML WG teleconference is cancelled [was: any HTML WG teleconference agenda...]
 
Wednesday, 12 December 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work
 
Tuesday, 11 December 2007
Wednesday, 12 December 2007
- Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: Video codec requirements changed [ISSUE-7 video-codecs]
 - any HTML WG teleconference agenda for this week?
 - Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: Video codec requirements changed
 - Video codec requirements changed
 - Re: Video codec requirements changed
 - Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed
 - Re: US-centricity of the Ogg problem
 
Tuesday, 11 December 2007
- Re: Video codec requirements changed
 - US-centricity of the Ogg problem
 - Video codec requirements changed
 - Re: Video codec requirements changed
 - key/value-based storage comments
 - SQL API comments
 - Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element
 - {minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2007-11-29
 - Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
 - Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
 - Video codec requirements changed
 - Re: Storage API
 - Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage
 - {minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2007-11-06 [resend]
 
Monday, 10 December 2007
- Re: Reanimate <xmp>
 - Re: Reanimate <xmp>
 - Re: Reanimate <xmp>
 - Re: Reanimate <xmp>
 - Re: Reanimate <xmp>
 - Re: Reanimate <xmp>
 - Re: Reanimate <xmp>
 - Re: Reanimate <xmp>
 
Sunday, 9 December 2007
- Copypaste error in vague date parsing algorithm
 - Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Reanimate <xmp>
 
Saturday, 8 December 2007
- Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status)
 - Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Fwd: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
 
Friday, 7 December 2007
- Public Understanding of the Timeframe of HTMl 5 Development
 - Add an @type attribute on code
 - Re: ISSUE-26: accessibility/usability of HTML5 and W3C default stylesheets [W3C publications]
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: validator being a reference Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: validator being a reference Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood (<wbr>)
 - validator being a reference Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 
Thursday, 6 December 2007
- ISSUE-15 immediate-mode-graphics proposal carries over objections
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood (<wbr>)
 - Re: DogFood, take 2
 - Re: ISSUE-27 (rel-ownership): @rel value ownership, registry consideration [HTML Principles/Requirements]
 - DogFood, take 2
 - Re: DogFood
 - ISSUE-27 (rel-ownership): @rel value ownership, registry consideration [HTML Principles/Requirements]
 - Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: DogFood (<wbr>)
 - Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints)
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: DogFood
 
Wednesday, 5 December 2007
- Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood
 - Re: DogFood
 - DogFood
 - Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
 - Re: Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 - Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
 - Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
 - Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
 - Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
 - Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
 - Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
 - Re: Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
 - Heading Element Order (h1 to h6)
 - A Preview of HTML 5 on A List Apart
 
Tuesday, 4 December 2007
- Re: About media=handheld?
 - Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status)
 - Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status)
 - Guide/AlternateElementTemplate
 
Monday, 3 December 2007
- Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status)
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - ISSUE-26: accessibility/usability of HTML5 and W3C default stylesheets [W3C publications]
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: About media=handheld?
 - Re: About media=handheld?
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 
Sunday, 2 December 2007
- Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: style attribute, only on font?
 - Re: style attribute, only on font?
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 
Saturday, 1 December 2007
Sunday, 2 December 2007
Saturday, 1 December 2007
- Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - RE: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: Unclear what: "For interoperability, authors are advised to avoid optional features of XML" means.
 - Re: ... other formats in HTML ...
 - ... other formats in HTML ...
 - Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element?
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: Unclear what: "For interoperability, authors are advised to avoid optional features of XML" means.
 - Added SVG To Wiki
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Unclear what: "For interoperability, authors are advised to avoid optional features of XML" means.
 - Re: ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: Request to assess JS/graphics perf. issues on embedded devices [was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
 - ISSUE-25 (js/graphics-vs-emb.devices): Request to assess JS/graphics perf. issues on embedded devices [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause [was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
 - ISSUE-24 (ogg-delete): Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause before publishing FPWD [HTML 5 spec]
 - Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
 - Request to assess JS/graphics perf. issues on embedded devices [was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
 - Request to delete "should support Ogg" clause [was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19)
 - Additions to HTML/Guide Wiki