Re: New HTML/XML Task Force Report

Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
>> I have incorporated those editorial changes that I felt would be
>> uncontroversial:
>>
>>  http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/snapshot/report-2012-01-12.html
>
> This round of edits added a link to an outdated document:
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#browsers
>
> I think the Report shouldn't link to a document as out of date (both
> technically and politically) as that one.

Ok. Is there a more appropriate reference that I could use instead?

> I suggest taking out the above-mentioned link to an outdated document
> and publishing without adding stuff about XML Signature or EXI.

As I said, I knew the polyglot stuff would be controversial; I have no
plans to attempt to include any of it before the first round of
publication.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 413 624 6676
www.marklogic.com