- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:36:56 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-html-xml@w3.org
Hi all, sorry I just missed the call, I somehow got distracted and didn't see IRC bounce. Looks like it would've been just Norm and I swapping Words With Friends tricks anyway. On Oct 4, 2011, at 15:57 , Norman Walsh wrote: > Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> writes: >> Here goes. As always: comments, tweaks, screams, etc. welcome! >> >> """ >> This Task Force believes that while complete alignment between the >> HTML and XML families may not be achievable or indeed desirable there >> are nevertheless areas in which cross-pollination between those two >> stacks could help improve either or both. Now that the delineation of >> these techonologies' respective domains have stabilised it would be >> more foolish than ever that these communities behave as warring >> factions while closed, proprietary formats still abound. Despite the >> important design differences that exist between HTML and XML their >> goals are not as divided as our mailing lists suggest, and one can >> still share experience regarding the production of round wheels >> irrespective of the rail track gauge. > > I'd wordsmith that a bit: > > This Task Force believes that while complete alignment between the > HTML and XML families may not be achievable, there are nevertheless > areas in which cross-pollination between those two stacks could help > improve either or both. Despite the important design differences > that exist between HTML and XML, their goals are not as divided as > some of the stormier rhetoric suggests. There are plenty of areas of > common experience despite significant differences in the details. That's probably a lot more readable than my version :) >> • Defining an XSLT and XQuery serialisation for polyglot HTML. >> Usage: make it trivial to produce it with a regular XML tool chain. >> [ed. I thought that this had been done, but I can't seem to find it >> anywhere] > > [ It's on my plate, I think :-/ ] Ah, good, I'll know who to annoy. > Some of these projects appeal to me more than others, but is there > a consensus on any (sub)set of them? Some of these projects don't appeal to me much. The criterion I used to pick them is that it's "there" and I can imagine a world in which something useful may come from the task. The idea is more to whet the reader's imagination and fire up her code-lust, not to prescribe a list of things that are necessarily good ideas. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 14:37:29 UTC