- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:30:50 -0400
- To: public-html-xml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2oc0hdpp1.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes
[1]W3C
- DRAFT -
HTML/XML Task Force
Meeting 10, 26 Jul 2011
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Norm, Bob Leif, Henri
Regrets
Noah, Mike Champion
Chair
Norm
Scribe
Norm
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Accept this agenda?
2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
3. [7]Next meeting 9 Aug 2011
4. [8]TPAC meeting
5. [9]Review of latest snapshot draft.
6. [10]Recent email threads
7. [11]Any other business?
* [12]Summary of Action Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<anne> I will attend over IRC
<darobin> I'll have to be attending over IRC as well
Accept this agenda?
-> [13]http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-agenda
<darobin> +1
Accepted
Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
-> [14]http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/06/28-minutes
Accepted.
Next meeting 9 Aug 2011
Anyone have to give regrets?
Robin gives regrets until September; Anne gives possible regrets for 9
Aug.
TPAC meeting
Norm: TPAC is meeting in November, is there any interest in even a brief
2f2 meeting if we're still active in October?
Bob: I'd be interested if it could start after 1:00 so that I could fly in
and out on the same day.
Norm: I'm not saying we have to have a meeting, but if we'll all be there
anyway.
... Ok, I'll leave it on the table as a possibility and we'll decide when
we get closer.
<darobin> [if we have a meeting, I'd suggest perhaps doing so with the TAG
on Monday]
<hsivonen> unfortunately, I don't know if I'll be at TPAC
<anne> meeting at TPAC seems fine; I might be on vacation Aug 9 but I do
not know yet
Review of latest snapshot draft.
-> [15]http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/snapshot/
Norm: Apologies, this wasn't actually on the agenda.
... But after our last meeting, I attempted to implement our decisions and
republished a draft.
... Is there anyone who has not had time to look at that draft?
Norm: Is there anyone who thinks I misrepresented our decisions?
None heard.
Some discussion of publication; consensus is that TAG has to publish.
Some discussion of schema validation which is perhaps a bit tangential
Recent email threads
Norm: I reviewed the recent threads and beyond a few vague requests for
greater clarity and some arguments that seemed to get resolved, I didn't
find much that felt actionable.
... Did anyone else see any comments they feel we must address?
<darobin> no, but I'd like to have more clarity on the clarification
requests
<darobin> if possible without having to demonstrate everything from first
principles :)
No one suggests any.
Bob: I don't think we have enough detail in the report.
... Is it our job to provide that detail.
Norm: I think we'd benefit from a few specific examples mailed to the
list.
... No one has suggested anything actionable in the recent email.
... I wonder if we should ask the TAG to publish this as a Note so that it
has real standing, not just an editorial snapshot.
Bob: I'd be happy with that providing we ask were do we go from here.
<darobin> publishing might get us broader feedback
Henri: It seems to me that there were requests for really broad things.
Can we assume that the issues are pretty much known? It's not clear to me
if that was a question of personal understanding or devils advocacy.
Norm: I think we'll have to address that to get the TAG to publish, but I
agree that we don't want to make a great, long exposition from first
principles.
... I think the question is, is there anything we as a task force want to
change about the document before we make it officially public.
Henri: To me it looks like the report is ready for publication, but I'd
like to read it again.
Norm: Thank you, Henri.
... I've been asked to report back to the TAG in early September. I
propose that at that meeting, I will request pubication. If anyone sees
anything between now and then that they think needs to be addressed,
please send it to the list.
... Anyone have any problems with that approach?
Henri: Sounds good to me.
<anne> I agree with hsivonen
<anne> And the approach sounds fine
Any other business?
None heard.
Adjourned.
Norm: Thank you all for attending, by phone or IRC, and we'll talk again
soon.
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [16]scribe.perl version 1.136 ([17]CVS
log)
$Date: 2011/07/26 15:29:41 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/06/28-agenda
3. http://www.w3.org/2011/07/26-html-xml-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes#item01
6. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes#item02
7. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes#item03
8. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes#item04
9. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes#item07
12. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-minutes#ActionSummary
13. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/07/26-agenda
14. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/2011/06/28-minutes
15. http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/snapshot/
16. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
17. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 15:31:19 UTC