- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:37:15 -0700
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, public-html-xml@w3.org
Fwiw ... (We are getting a bit far afield from the question raised by Jeni Tennison at the beginning of this thread, but when such technical minutiae arise in the discussion, it's probably worth having the record be correct. So I offer a couple of pedantic observations on details in HS's email; they do not, it seems to me, affect the validity or otherwise of his overall argument.) On Dec 4, 2011, at 11:58 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote: > ... > > Booleans in XSD have a lexical space that accept "0" or "1", but ARIA > states that take "true" and "false" don't take "0" or "1": > http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/complete#aria-required (There are also > ARIA states that take more than 2 values two of which are "true" and > "false" and the others aren't "0" or "1"!) It's not hard to define a subtype of xsd:boolean that accepts only 'true' and 'false' (or any other subset of the lexical space). It's also not hard to define a union of boolean (or of such a subtype) with another type containing the other values needed in an enumerated type. > The lexical space for various XSD number types includes leading and > trailing whitespace as valid. Not quite true; the lexical space of numbers in XSD does not (as that technical term is defined by that spec) contain any whitespace at all. But almost true: for some types, the literal is processed according to the value of its whitespace facet before it is checked against the lexical space; it is this which allows <e> 42 </e> to be valid when e is declared as having type integer. -- **************************************************************** * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC * http://www.blackmesatech.com * http://cmsmcq.com/mib * http://balisage.net ****************************************************************
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 20:37:53 UTC