- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:53:13 +0700
- To: public-html-xml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTikPk4UdKrv4oDHQA6sBLzptmorOTYV3P6HREPEz@mail.gmail.com>
> > > > Also I think we should look at the HTML5 distributed extensibility issue > > I don't have the energy to read through 600+ emails. If someone else > does, fine. > I think the key things are: The like-svg change proposal: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/extensionslikesvg The zero-change proposal: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-41 Responses from the HTML WG to straw poll on the like-SVG approach: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-41-objection-poll/results including Henri's response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Sep/0054.html and Microsoft's response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/0116.html TAG comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Oct/0033.html My interpretation of the responses is that the WG much prefers the zero-change approach. BTW, I don't agree with Henri that this is out of order. It is about embedding XML in HTML, and so is absolutely central to the work of this TF. James
Received on Monday, 20 December 2010 23:53:46 UTC