public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org from June 2008 by date

Monday, 30 June 2008

• Re: heads-up about "new" URLs section in HTML5 editor's draft Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 16 June 2008

• RE: drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? Dan Connolly
• RE: drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? Justin James
• Re: drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? Steven Faulkner
• Re: drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? Karl Dubost
• drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? Gregory J. Rosmaita

Friday, 13 June 2008

• Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...] Dan Connolly
• Re: discretion & the issue tracker (was Re: discretion in adding issues) Dan Connolly

Friday, 6 June 2008

• Re: Tracker states: RAISED, OPEN, CLOSED Michael(tm) Smith
• Tracker states: RAISED, OPEN, CLOSED Shawn Medero

Wednesday, 4 June 2008

• Re: discretion & the issue tracker (was Re: discretion in adding issues) Julian Reschke
• Re: discretion & the issue tracker (was Re: discretion in adding issues) Gregory J. Rosmaita
• discretion & the issue tracker (was Re: discretion in adding issues) Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...] Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...] Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...] Michael(tm) Smith

Last message date: Monday, 30 June 2008 04:30:09 UTC