- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:12:24 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: public-html-wg-issue-tracking <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: >> So, for the first one, would that be 3..6 weeks starting Aug 28? > > No, what I had in mind is: ending 28 Aug. OK, just wanted that to be clarified. The sooner, the better. > The norm is that WG members get a week to consider a question > and respond. The dates above are suggested as the start of that > week-long period. > > This doesn't give 3 weeks notice on > head-profile, but I'm reasonably sure all the relevant parties > have already been in contact with us and said what they > have to say. Yes. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 17:19:56 UTC