- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:14:17 -0400
- To: HTML WG announcements <public-html-wg-announce@w3.org>
Available at
http://www.w3.org/2014/03/20-html-wg-minutes.html
Text version:
HTML Weekly Teleconference
20 Mar 2014
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2014JanMar/0026.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/20-html-wg-irc
Attendees
Present
paulc, Sam, Eliot, jaymunro, Plh, Daniel_Austin,
adrianba, cabanier
Chair
Paul
Scribe
plh
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Action items
2. [6]HTML 5.0 issues
3. [7]Last Call Status
4. [8]W3C DOM4
5. [9]longdesc status
6. [10]CR progress
7. [11]status of HTML 5.0
8. [12]f2f meeting
9. [13]AOB
10. [14]next meeting
* [15]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
Action items
Paul: none
HTML 5.0 issues
Paul: only one is issue 151, about WHATWG references in the
status section of the document
... Sam sent a note about that earlier and we're working with
the editors
... we're trying to make sure we have everything covered
issue-151?
<trackbot> issue-151 -- Remove WhatWG and html5.org references
in status section of document -- open
<trackbot> [16]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/151
[16] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/151
Last Call Status
Paul: Polyglot
... one large LC comment, worked on by the editor
<paulc> One section to revisit:
[17]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24451#c9
[17] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24451#c9
Eliot: there is one section that needs to be revisited. should
be done in a couple of days
POaul: once this gets closed off, the LC will be done and we'll
need to figure how to get to CR
... so, we'll need exit criteria
Eliot: Leif is making a draft for that
... should have something in a couple of weeks
W3C DOM4
Paul: that's in last call
... didn't hear back from Robin
plh: I don't have an update unfortunately
Paul: ok, we're still on schedule. there are issues in the spec
btw
longdesc status
Paul: TF preference is to skip CR phase
... Status: "The A11Y coordination team continues to make
progress on the Exit Criteria. We are getting closer to
reaching consensus.
Good news is the implementation report is getting developed in
parallel."
Paul: the individuals are all at CSUN this week
CR progress
Paul: Moving canvas2d back to last call
... it appears that the hit region algorithm is in the L2 spec,
and they're trying to figure which subset needs to be in L1
Rik: it's becoming apparent that what people think is in the
spec is not there
... we're working on it
Paul: any discussion in the sub-team on if f2f discussion?
Rik: I won't be able to attend (conflict with SVG)
... and Rich won't be able to either
Paul: ok, we'll figure the next steps
status of HTML 5.0
Paul: good news, we're done to 0 bugs
... only remaining is the one about at risk features
... see also
[18]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24812#c11
[18] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24812#c11
plh: this is a moving target discussion btw. firefox shipped
this week without an HTML5 feature (input color). blink-dev is
discussing whether to remove another one (style scoped)
Paul: big thanks to the HTML editors for their work!
[19]https://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/HTML_Normative_References
[19] https://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/HTML_Normative_References
plh: Robin has been cleaning some of the references earlier
this week
... this affects HTML5
Paul: 4 specs are still problematic
... re features at risk. the bug concentrates on the list from
the status
[20]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24812#c10
[20] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24812#c10
scribe: any study on others?
plh: c10 is one of them
... we'll have hundreds of test results in time for f2f
f2f meeting
Paul: end date for registration is March 28
... long list of potential topics
[21]https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2014-04-Agenda#Potential_To
pics
[21]
https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2014-04-Agenda#Potential_Topics
Paul: plh, you've been talking about testing results
... Mike came with canvas results in the past
plh: i expect we'll generate test results in the week of April
1
Paul: ok, I added a forward pointer to that in the agenda
... announcing the test results as early as possible will be
useful
... for media task force, we're aiming on the second day in the
morning
... we'll need a teleconference facility
Daniel: we'll have this
AOB
Paul: we covered testing results
plh: re MSE tests from Google. is there someone looking at
them>
paul: it's been taken care of. won't have them stable by f2f
<tobint>
[22]https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/ResourceP
riorities/Overview.html
[22]
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/ResourcePriorities/Overview.html
tobin: I'm from the web performance working group
... following up on resource priorities
<tobint>
[23]http://www.w3.org/2013/11/14-html-wg-minutes.html#item19
[23] http://www.w3.org/2013/11/14-html-wg-minutes.html#item19
tobin: the work is continuing ion web performance
<tobint> [24]http://www.w3.org/2014/03/19-webperf-minutes.html
[24] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/19-webperf-minutes.html
tobin: some questions making sure we're still in sync with HTML
5.1
... just want to make sure the html group is aware of it
paul: this is an extension spec
... is this an item where you need hooks or future merge?
tobin: potentially, we might ask for a merge
paul: if your working group needs hooks, please feel free to
ask
... thank you to the editors for getting us to 0 bug
next meeting
plh can scribe again
Sam will chair
[adjourned]
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:14:19 UTC