- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:36:16 -0800
- To: "public-html-wg-announce@w3.org" <public-html-wg-announce@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <83F37C1A4497B54589EAEDC750D03A941E849FD9A3@nambx09.corp.adobe.com>
Available at:
http://www.w3.org/2012/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html
HTML Weekly Teleconference
29 Nov 2012
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2012/11/29-html-wg-irc
Attendees
Present
Sam, +1.206.850.aaaa, cabanier, paulc, [Microsoft],
jaymunro, edoyle, christian, +1.613.287.aabb,
MartinSoukup, Plh, +1.415.595.aacc, adrianba, hober,
Cynthia_Shelly
Regrets
Chair
rubys
Scribe
cabanier
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]ACTION items due by Thursday, November 29
2. [5]a) ACTION-223: Figure out how extension specs can
refer to HTML 5.1
3. [6]2. Document status
4. [7]a) HTML5 - Transition request sent
5. [8]b) HTML Canvas 2D - transition request sent
6. [9]HTML Microdata - Call for Rationale Statements
7. [10]Polyglot - need exit criteria and resolve
normative status
8. [11]Alt Techniques - need exit criteria and resolve
normative status
9. [12]Main Element - FPWD approved
10. [13]ARIA in HTML - awaiting input from A11y TF
11. [14]Task Force Reports
12. [15]testing Task Force
13. [16]Accessibility Task Force
14. [17]Media Task Force
15. [18]Other Business
16. [19]Administrative mailing list nearly set up
17. [20]scribe for next meeting
* [21]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 29 November 2012
<scribe> scribenick: cabanier
ACTION items due by Thursday, November 29
a) ACTION-223: Figure out how extension specs can refer to HTML 5.1
paulc: I only saw this item this morning.
... can I look at tit for next week?
rubys: is that OK for everyone?
<rubys> action 223 is due in one week
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find 223. You can review and
register nicknames at
<[22]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/users>.
[22] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/users%3E.
2. Document status
a) HTML5 - Transition request sent
rubys: we got consensus to proceed to CR
... I think we will have decision by a week
... awaiting decision from the director
... any comments?
b) HTML Canvas 2D - transition request sent
rubys: we also had no formal objections and got consensus to go
to CR
... and a request to shorten the CR period
... we will also have a decision on this by next week
HTML Microdata - Call for Rationale Statements
rubys: we have rationale why it should be a note
... ...but we have a response from the editor that it should be a
REC
<rubys>
[23]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/022
7.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0227.html
rubys: ... we have 2 things that could serve as rationales
... ... I would like to give people the opportunity to improve
the rationale or ask for a longer time
Polyglot - need exit criteria and resolve normative status
rubys: we have 2 things: define exit criteria and resolve
normative status
... ... we have a rationale why it should be a note and not a rec
... we had a volunteer at TPAC but we haven't heard anything
since
adrianba: I will volunteer to have the rationale posted why it
should be a rec
... can I have a week to have that ready?
rubys: yes
... OK. any more questions on polyglot
Alt Techniques - need exit criteria and resolve normative status
rubys: same as polyglot.
... ... we need exit criteria and have rationales.
... ...we can proceed to a survey
Main Element - FPWD approved
rubys: we have approval for FPWD
ARIA in HTML - awaiting input from A11y TF
rubys: my understanding that it was supposed to be covered in
the previous meeting
Philip: I don't think it did
Task Force Reports
esting Task Force
rubys: can anyone comment on testing?
Philip: I don't think they met
... I didn't see a report
Accessibility Task Force
rubys: anyone have any comments?
cynthia: they just finished the meeting
... Charles will arrive shortly
Media Task Force
adrianba: we met Tuesday
... ... there is a bunch of work for the editors
... ...we discussed the encrypted media spec. talked about user
data that can be sent over the encrypted channel
... ... and we discussed input from Adobe about how the web
application becomes part of the communication between the dvm
and the license server
Other Business
Administrative mailing list nearly set up
rubys: I provided a link:
[24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/
... should be set up shortly
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/
Philip: I keep working on the F2F for the week of April 22
... first 2 days for webapps and the next 2 days for HTML and
HTML accessibility taskforce
... I'm waiting for confirmation on specific days
<adrianba> my apologies for not scribing today - I hadn't
realized it was my turn - I will volunteer for next week
scribe for next meeting
rubys: any volunteers?
<paulc> Paul will likely be on point to Chair.
rubys: Charles didn't call in
paulc: since I'm chairing next I will do follow up with the task
force reports
rubys: I think we are adjourned
Summary of Action Items
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:36:49 UTC