- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:36:16 -0800
- To: "public-html-wg-announce@w3.org" <public-html-wg-announce@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <83F37C1A4497B54589EAEDC750D03A941E849FD9A3@nambx09.corp.adobe.com>
Available at: http://www.w3.org/2012/11/29-html-wg-minutes.html HTML Weekly Teleconference 29 Nov 2012 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/11/29-html-wg-irc Attendees Present Sam, +1.206.850.aaaa, cabanier, paulc, [Microsoft], jaymunro, edoyle, christian, +1.613.287.aabb, MartinSoukup, Plh, +1.415.595.aacc, adrianba, hober, Cynthia_Shelly Regrets Chair rubys Scribe cabanier Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]ACTION items due by Thursday, November 29 2. [5]a) ACTION-223: Figure out how extension specs can refer to HTML 5.1 3. [6]2. Document status 4. [7]a) HTML5 - Transition request sent 5. [8]b) HTML Canvas 2D - transition request sent 6. [9]HTML Microdata - Call for Rationale Statements 7. [10]Polyglot - need exit criteria and resolve normative status 8. [11]Alt Techniques - need exit criteria and resolve normative status 9. [12]Main Element - FPWD approved 10. [13]ARIA in HTML - awaiting input from A11y TF 11. [14]Task Force Reports 12. [15]testing Task Force 13. [16]Accessibility Task Force 14. [17]Media Task Force 15. [18]Other Business 16. [19]Administrative mailing list nearly set up 17. [20]scribe for next meeting * [21]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 29 November 2012 <scribe> scribenick: cabanier ACTION items due by Thursday, November 29 a) ACTION-223: Figure out how extension specs can refer to HTML 5.1 paulc: I only saw this item this morning. ... can I look at tit for next week? rubys: is that OK for everyone? <rubys> action 223 is due in one week <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find 223. You can review and register nicknames at <[22]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/users>. [22] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/users%3E. 2. Document status a) HTML5 - Transition request sent rubys: we got consensus to proceed to CR ... I think we will have decision by a week ... awaiting decision from the director ... any comments? b) HTML Canvas 2D - transition request sent rubys: we also had no formal objections and got consensus to go to CR ... and a request to shorten the CR period ... we will also have a decision on this by next week HTML Microdata - Call for Rationale Statements rubys: we have rationale why it should be a note ... ...but we have a response from the editor that it should be a REC <rubys> [23]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/022 7.html [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0227.html rubys: ... we have 2 things that could serve as rationales ... ... I would like to give people the opportunity to improve the rationale or ask for a longer time Polyglot - need exit criteria and resolve normative status rubys: we have 2 things: define exit criteria and resolve normative status ... ... we have a rationale why it should be a note and not a rec ... we had a volunteer at TPAC but we haven't heard anything since adrianba: I will volunteer to have the rationale posted why it should be a rec ... can I have a week to have that ready? rubys: yes ... OK. any more questions on polyglot Alt Techniques - need exit criteria and resolve normative status rubys: same as polyglot. ... ... we need exit criteria and have rationales. ... ...we can proceed to a survey Main Element - FPWD approved rubys: we have approval for FPWD ARIA in HTML - awaiting input from A11y TF rubys: my understanding that it was supposed to be covered in the previous meeting Philip: I don't think it did Task Force Reports esting Task Force rubys: can anyone comment on testing? Philip: I don't think they met ... I didn't see a report Accessibility Task Force rubys: anyone have any comments? cynthia: they just finished the meeting ... Charles will arrive shortly Media Task Force adrianba: we met Tuesday ... ... there is a bunch of work for the editors ... ...we discussed the encrypted media spec. talked about user data that can be sent over the encrypted channel ... ... and we discussed input from Adobe about how the web application becomes part of the communication between the dvm and the license server Other Business Administrative mailing list nearly set up rubys: I provided a link: [24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/ ... should be set up shortly [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/ Philip: I keep working on the F2F for the week of April 22 ... first 2 days for webapps and the next 2 days for HTML and HTML accessibility taskforce ... I'm waiting for confirmation on specific days <adrianba> my apologies for not scribing today - I hadn't realized it was my turn - I will volunteer for next week scribe for next meeting rubys: any volunteers? <paulc> Paul will likely be on point to Chair. rubys: Charles didn't call in paulc: since I'm chairing next I will do follow up with the task force reports rubys: I think we are adjourned Summary of Action Items
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:36:49 UTC