- From: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:29:56 -0700
- To: public-html-wg-announce@w3.org
The minutes for our September 15th weekly teleconference are available in HTML at: http://www.w3.org/2011/09/15-html-wg-minutes.html and in plain text below: - DRAFT - HTML Weekly Teleconference 15 Sep 2011 Attendees Present Regrets Chair mjs Scribe hober Contents * Topics 1. Action items due by Thursday, September 15 2. New Issues This Week 3. Items Closed Last Week 4. Items Closing This Week 5. Items Closing Next Week 6. New Calls this week 7. New Surveys this week 8. Decisions this week 9. Other Business 10. Scribe for next meeting 11. Adjournment * Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ Action items due by Thursday, September 15 mjs: there are none New Issues This Week mjs: there are none ... one tracker request [39]http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&keywords=T rackerRequest [39] http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&keywords=TrackerRequest <pimpbot> Title: Bug List (at w3.org) mjs: ongoing discussion in that bug to generate title & summary for the issue to be raised ... may become issue next week ... the issue is the removal of the editing section from the html5 spec & creating a new spec Items Closed Last Week mjs: there are none Items Closing This Week mjs: there are none Items Closing Next Week mjs: there are also none New Calls this week mjs: ISSUE-175 domparsing-ref: Call for Proposals, due October 14 [40]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/175 [40] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/175 <pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-175: Normative Reference to Work Attributed Solely to Pseudonymous Author - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) mjs: ISSUE-166 html-sandboxed: Call for Consensus, objections due September 22 ... no counter proposals were produced before the deadline [41]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/166 [41] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/166 <pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-166: text/html-sandboxed does not always fail closed - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) New Surveys this week mjs: there are also none Decisions this week mjs: there are none Testing Task Force Report mjs: may have incorrectly scheduled tf reports; the testing tf would like to give its status now krisk: we met last week as planned <krisk> [42]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Se p/0006.html [42] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Sep/0006.html <pimpbot> Title: RE: HTML Testing Task Force Conf Call Agenda 9/6/2011 from Kris Krueger on 2011-09-15 (public-html-testsuite@w3.org from September 2011) (at lists.w3.org) krisk: discussion to move getElementsByTagName tests from HTML to DOM Core test suite in webapps ... waiting to hear from opera ... updates to approved canvas tests to deal with a WebIDL change <krisk> bug 10623? <pimpbot> 11[43]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10623 annevk, P2, REOPENED, 13Simplify Web IDL exceptions [43] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10623 krisk: we will revisit this when the bug is resolved ... we meet again next week ... microsoft has submitted new tests for appcache and the history pushState API Other Business <Zakim> MikeSmith, you wanted to ask for extension on Sep 2 deadline MikeSmith: a11y call an hour ago ... we missed a date in our original schedule that the chairs published in june <MikeSmith> [44]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0315.htm l [44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0315.html <pimpbot> Title: Revised Timeline and New Bug Priority Policy from Maciej Stachowiak on 2011-06-23 (public-html@w3.org from June 2011) (at lists.w3.org) MikeSmith: september 2nd was deadline for objecting for initial priority settings or deferrals ... we have a group doing a11y bug triage to determine actions ... mike cooper reported they could probably get done within the next two weeks ... would the chairs consider changing that deadline & give us until sept 29 for this? ... we suspect some of these bugs need to be higher priority than they are mjs: both other chairs are on vacation, would rather not make unilateral change ... will bring it up with co-chair(s) when they're back from vacation ... please point out bugs that need escalation & will review each on a case-by-case basis Scribe for next meeting Adjournment
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 16:30:25 UTC