- From: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:29:56 -0700
- To: public-html-wg-announce@w3.org
The minutes for our September 15th weekly teleconference are available
in HTML at:
http://www.w3.org/2011/09/15-html-wg-minutes.html
and in plain text below:
- DRAFT -
HTML Weekly Teleconference
15 Sep 2011
Attendees
Present
Regrets
Chair
mjs
Scribe
hober
Contents
* Topics
1. Action items due by Thursday, September 15
2. New Issues This Week
3. Items Closed Last Week
4. Items Closing This Week
5. Items Closing Next Week
6. New Calls this week
7. New Surveys this week
8. Decisions this week
9. Other Business
10. Scribe for next meeting
11. Adjournment
* Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
Action items due by Thursday, September 15
mjs: there are none
New Issues This Week
mjs: there are none
... one tracker request
[39]http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&keywords=T
rackerRequest
[39] http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&keywords=TrackerRequest
<pimpbot> Title: Bug List (at w3.org)
mjs: ongoing discussion in that bug to generate title & summary for
the issue to be raised
... may become issue next week
... the issue is the removal of the editing section from the html5
spec & creating a new spec
Items Closed Last Week
mjs: there are none
Items Closing This Week
mjs: there are none
Items Closing Next Week
mjs: there are also none
New Calls this week
mjs: ISSUE-175 domparsing-ref: Call for Proposals, due October 14
[40]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/175
[40] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/175
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-175: Normative Reference to Work Attributed
Solely to Pseudonymous Author - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
mjs: ISSUE-166 html-sandboxed: Call for Consensus, objections due
September 22
... no counter proposals were produced before the deadline
[41]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/166
[41] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/166
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-166: text/html-sandboxed does not always fail
closed - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
New Surveys this week
mjs: there are also none
Decisions this week
mjs: there are none
Testing Task Force Report
mjs: may have incorrectly scheduled tf reports; the testing tf would
like to give its status now
krisk: we met last week as planned
<krisk>
[42]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Se
p/0006.html
[42] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Sep/0006.html
<pimpbot> Title: RE: HTML Testing Task Force Conf Call Agenda
9/6/2011 from Kris Krueger on 2011-09-15
(public-html-testsuite@w3.org from September 2011) (at lists.w3.org)
krisk: discussion to move getElementsByTagName tests from HTML to
DOM Core test suite in webapps
... waiting to hear from opera
... updates to approved canvas tests to deal with a WebIDL change
<krisk> bug 10623?
<pimpbot> 11[43]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10623
annevk, P2, REOPENED, 13Simplify Web IDL exceptions
[43] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10623
krisk: we will revisit this when the bug is resolved
... we meet again next week
... microsoft has submitted new tests for appcache and the history
pushState API
Other Business
<Zakim> MikeSmith, you wanted to ask for extension on Sep 2 deadline
MikeSmith: a11y call an hour ago
... we missed a date in our original schedule that the chairs
published in june
<MikeSmith>
[44]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0315.htm
l
[44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0315.html
<pimpbot> Title: Revised Timeline and New Bug Priority Policy from
Maciej Stachowiak on 2011-06-23 (public-html@w3.org from June 2011)
(at lists.w3.org)
MikeSmith: september 2nd was deadline for objecting for initial
priority settings or deferrals
... we have a group doing a11y bug triage to determine actions
... mike cooper reported they could probably get done within the
next two weeks
... would the chairs consider changing that deadline & give us until
sept 29 for this?
... we suspect some of these bugs need to be higher priority than
they are
mjs: both other chairs are on vacation, would rather not make
unilateral change
... will bring it up with co-chair(s) when they're back from
vacation
... please point out bugs that need escalation & will review each on
a case-by-case basis
Scribe for next meeting
Adjournment
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 16:30:25 UTC