- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 17:50:36 +0900
- To: public-html-wg-announce@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/2010/05/13-html-wg-minutes.html
Present
Laura, Matt, Janina, Radhika_Roy, MichaelCooper, RobEnnals,
Cynthia, Julian, Philippe, KrisK, Adrian, Eliot, Sam,
Gregory, MikeSmith
Regrets
Gregory_Rosmaita
Chair
mike
Scribe
rubys
Contents
* Topics
1. 1. ACTION items due by Thu May 13
2. action items due by Thursday May 13
3. 2. Issues with deadlines due by May 13
4. 3. Items that close next week (by Thu May 20)
5. 5. New Calls for Proposals/Counter Proposals/Consensus
this Week
6. 4. New Issues This Week:
7. 6. WG Decision Policy update
8. 8. Task Force Reports
9. 7. Surveys
10. testing task force
11. 9. Other Business
12. 10. Scribe for next meeting
* Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
1. ACTION items due by Thu May 13
action items due by Thursday May 13
<MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda
<pimpbot> Title: Input for Agenda Planning for the HTML Weekly -
HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
action-178?
<trackbot> ACTION-178 -- Philippe Le Hgaret to contact the various
chairs/co-chairs to resolve the use of the text/html mime type --
due 2010-04-29 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/178
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/178
<pimpbot> Title: ACTION-178 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
<MikeSmith> action-178 due in two weeks
<trackbot> ACTION-178 Contact the various chairs/co-chairs to
resolve the use of the text/html mime type due date now in two weeks
plh: it is not clear to me that we have an issue, but I want to make
sure that we don't have an issue
<MikeSmith> action-178 due 2010-05-27
<trackbot> ACTION-178 Contact the various chairs/co-chairs to
resolve the use of the text/html mime type due date now 2010-05-27
2. Issues with deadlines due by May 13
<MikeSmith> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html
http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html
<pimpbot> Title: Change Proposal Status (at dev.w3.org)
mike: none
... I do see some overdue actions... skipping for now
3. Items that close next week (by Thu May 20)
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-89 idioms - Call for Counter-Proposals ends
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Call for Counter-Proposals ends
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-103 srcdoc-xml-escaping - Call for
Counter-Proposals ends
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-107 plugin-fallback-example - Call for
Counter-Proposals ends
<MikeSmith> issue-89?
<trackbot> ISSUE-89 -- Remove Section 4.12 Common Idioms without
dedicated Elements -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/89
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/89
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-89 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
<Julian> I don't see any counter proposals
<MikeSmith>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1069.htm
l
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1069.html
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Alternate
Proposals or Counter-Proposals from Maciej Stachowiak on 2010-04-21
(public-html@w3.org from April 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
<Julian> according to
http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html
http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html
<pimpbot> Title: Change Proposal Status (at dev.w3.org)
mike: issue 89 call for counter proposals closes next week, if no
counter proposals are received, the chairs will make a decision
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-92
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-92?
<trackbot> ISSUE-92 -- Re-write the Table section to remove
extraneous material, and provide cleaner description -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/92
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/92
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-92 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
<MikeSmith>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1072.htm
l
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1072.html
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Alternate
Proposals or Counter-Proposals from Maciej Stachowiak on 2010-04-21
(public-html@w3.org from April 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
issue-92: same situation for this issue
<trackbot> ISSUE-92 Re-write the Table section to remove extraneous
material, and provide cleaner description notes added
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-103?
<trackbot> ISSUE-103 -- XML escaping in iframe/@srcdoc -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/103
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/103
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-103 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
julian: just waiting on it to proceed through the process
mike: if anybody is interested in making counter proposals, you have
one week left
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-107?
<trackbot> ISSUE-107 -- Politics in fallback example for plugin
usage -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/107
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/107
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-107 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
<MikeSmith>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1071.htm
l
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1071.html
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-107 plugin-fallback-example - Chairs Solicit
Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals from Maciej Stachowiak on
2010-04-21 (public-html@w3.org from April 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
mike: I see some discussion, but no counter proposals
... ... you've got a week
5. New Calls for Proposals/Counter Proposals/Consensus this Week
4. New Issues This Week:
mike: no new issues
... no new calls for proposals or counter proposals
6. WG Decision Policy update
<MikeSmith>
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
<pimpbot> Title: HTML Working Group Decision Policy (at dev.w3.org)
<MikeSmith> Editor's draft of decision-policy doc
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html
<pimpbot> Title: HTML Working Group Decision Policy (at dev.w3.org)
sam: I believe that everything is on track for an update to be done
by the 15th
8. Task Force Reports
janina: everything is on track. We expect to be delivering
requirements by may 27th.
... we expect to providing deadlines for all items by may 27th
... there is no longer an objection to proceeding on issue-85
... we want something blocking last call, and cynthia has already
reported bugs
... canvas is being held up awaiting input from developers, in
particular from Apple. If feedback is not received, RichardS plans
to proceed anyway.
... usemap is to be written up by Chaals, if we don't hear from
Chaals we will proceed anyway.
mike: anything else?
janina: four separate teleconferences spun out, things are
proceeding well
7. Surveys
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-66 image-analysis -
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-66-objection-poll/
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-66-objection-poll/
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-90 figure -
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-90-objection-poll/
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-90-objection-poll/
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-91 aside -
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-91-objection-poll/
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-91-objection-poll/
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-93 details -
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-93-objection-poll/
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-93-objection-poll/
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-95 hidden -
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-95-objection-poll/
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-95-objection-poll/
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-96 progress -
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-96-objection-poll/
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-96-objection-poll/
<MikeSmith> ISSUE-97 meter -
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-97-objection-poll/
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-97-objection-poll/
mike: we have separate surveys for issues 90, 91, 93, 95, 96, 97.
... you are not obligated to comment; please follow the directions
from the chairs when making comments
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010May/0056.htm
l
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010May/0056.html
<pimpbot> Title: Prep for Heartbeat Drafts from Sam Ruby on
2010-05-05 (public-html@w3.org from May 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
Rob Ennals: we are trying to determine what the objections are
<Laura> No it was Cynthia.
cynthia: if the change proposals capture the objection, there is no
need to state an objection, right?
mike: this process is not different from what was done with
microdata
... the decision policy empowers the chairs to weigh the weight of
the objections and to make a decision
cynthia: the policy is confusing
rob_ennals: the purpose of the survey is not to determine consensus
cynthia: when do we do the other things
sam: we are tying to avoid votes
cynthia: I am going to simply fill in the form with which one I
agree with and which ones I disagree with
sam: I discourage Cynthia from stating which ones she agrees with
rob ennals: we want new arguments
<plh> q
mike: the surveys are open (you have to authenticate)
testing task force
<krisk> We have one approved test -
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/raw-file/tip/tests/approved/attribute
s/anchor_href.htm
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/raw-file/tip/tests/approved/attributes/anchor_href.htm
<pimpbot> Title: HTMLAnchorElement href Attribute Test (at
dvcs.w3.org)
<krisk> The test is a good example for tests that can run
synchronously
<krisk> The group will be creating some video tests
<krisk> Which will spur a round of converstations about test harness
requirements
<krisk> Microsoft has submmitted tests for foreign content and will
submit some more test for Selection and getElementsByClassName
<krisk> The meeting schedule has been extended - same time/schedule
<krisk> For more info see the wiki
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Testing or the list
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2010Ma
y/
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Testing
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2010May/
<pimpbot> Title: Testing - HTML WG Wiki (at www.w3.org)
mike: any questions?
<krisk> plh is working on getting the approved tests from HG to
tests.w.3.org/html5/
plh: remember that we are not expecting to reach consensus, because
of the loaded issues we're dealing with; what the chairs are
attempting to do is identify the path that raises the least
objection
cynthia: thank you, that was much more clear
9. Other Business
mike: hearing none, moving on...
10. Scribe for next meeting
mike: volunteers?
... hearing none, adjourned...
<MikeSmith> [adjourned]
<MikeSmith> thanks to Sam for scribing
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Friday, 14 May 2010 08:50:46 UTC