- From: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:24:30 +0300
- To: public-html-wg-announce@w3.org
- Cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
Related to the IRI/URI/URL/URL reference discussion http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20080710#l-386 [18:33] <robburns> The spec actually says it uses a different definition of URL than the related RFCs. If that's not he case, then that note should be removed. http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20080710#l-408 [18:37] <robburns> "The term "URL" in this specification is used in a manner distinct from the precise technical meaning it is given in RFC 3986. Readers familiar with that RFC will find it easier to read this specification if they pretend the term "URL" as used herein is really called something else altogether." [18:37] <robburns> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#terminology0 http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20080710#l-438 [18:41] <robburns> q+ to say that the problem is that the draft says it redefines it and yet Ian and DanC's test indicate it has not been redefined (so why create confusion for the reader of the draft) On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:03 PM, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: > aloha, rob! > >>> as usual, please log any errors, omissions, corrections, >>> clarifications, >>> misattributions, and the like by replying-to this announcement on- >>> list... > > you might also want to check the IRC log to ascertain if you can find > some comments that should've been in the minutes... > > gregory. >
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 20:25:33 UTC