- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:05:04 -0500
- To: public-html-wg-announce <public-html-wg-announce@w3.org>
Please consider the following proposals over the coming week: "Shall we release HTML Design Principles as a W3C Working Draft? Specifically, version 1.18 of 2007-11-02 13:48:38 plus any publication-related changes ..." -- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/ "Shall we release HTML 5 as a W3C Working Draft? Specifically, the co-chairs (Dan Connolly and Chris Wilson) will choose between v1.310 (Nov 1 03:11:43 2007 UTC) and any later revisions from the editors this week ..." "Shall we release HTML 5 differences from HTML 4 along with the HTML 5 specification as a W3C Working Draft? Specifically, revision 1.33 of 2007-10-22 11:17:20 plus any publication-related changes ..." -- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd11spec/ The questions about the differences document depends on the outcome of the question about the specification, so it's in the same survey. The question about the design principles is separate. Section 3.3 Consensus in the W3C process defines consensus as a "substantial number" in support of a proposal and no formal objections. As with earlier formal questions in this Working Group, for each question: * If the results indicate consensus, the question carries. * Otherwise, the chairs will consider the rationale behind the formal objections and decide whether to let the question carry despite these objections. We'll take a week to allow WG participants to respond to this questionnaires and then the chairs will announce the result. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 21:05:14 UTC