- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:17:00 -0500
- To: public-html-wg-announce@w3.org, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 21:41 +0200, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:14:15 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > > In June, this survey suggested that the WG should release > > the design principles first. As progress on the design principles > > is rather slower than expected, it seems reasonable to > > re-consider priorities. In this week's teleconference, > > I agreed to re-open this survey. > > http://www.w3.org/2007/10/18-html-wg-minutes > > > > If your position has changed or you didn't respond previously, > > please fill out the form... > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd7/ > > > > Results are, as usual, world-readable. > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd7/results > > Hi Dan, > > Opera has a large number of representatives in the group. If this is an > official survey then I guess we should just have one vote (not a dozen), > through Anne van Kesteren (formally our representative). Or should each > Opera representative add our two øre worth? It's a straw poll, not a vote. Each person is welcome to respond. WBS knows this; seems like a bug that it doesn't tell you. Wish me luck finding time to follow up on getting that fixed... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 19 October 2007 20:16:24 UTC