- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:44:58 +0100
- To: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- CC: public-html-testsuite@w3.org
On 11/12/2012 16:38 , Ms2ger wrote: > My main issue with this approach is that we've never been good at > reviewing tests in a timely manner, and I don't see a reason to expect > that to change. It seems to me like we will end up with dozens of > branches someone once created, and that will just hang around until > someone else, unaware of the previous submission, will duplicate them. Note that with the CR draft out of the way and the automatic spec builder up and running I now have a decent amount of bandwidth to dedicate to testing. I'm happy to make reviewing a priority over test writing; I think it's only fair that test writers can expect reviews bright and early. (I'll try to do early; I'll ask Mike when I need bright.) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 15:45:12 UTC