- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:17:57 -0400
- To: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "'public-html-testsuite@w3.org'" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>, Matheus Kerschbaum <matjk7@gmail.com>, Michael Ventnor <mventnor@mozilla.com>, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
On Tuesday 2011-10-18 14:50 +0000, Kris Krueger wrote: > As part of the Test Review period, I looked at the cases submitted in the Mozilla folder. > Here is my feedback, looks like with a few updates they all can get approved unless someone objects. > > These cases looks fine - > http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Mozilla/window-onerror-parse-error.html > http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Mozilla/window-onerror-runtime-error-throw.html > http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Mozilla/window-onerror-runtime-error.html These were mine. What needs to happen for them to be approved? > This case doesn't use the harness and doesn't look completed. > http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Mozilla/script-for-onload.html cc:ing Matheus Kerschbaum > You should use video files from http://media.w3.org/2010/05/video/ and make sure they are browser agnostic. > http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/approved/video/event_loadeddata.html has an example how to do this using the media.js file. > > iFrames and dataURI's don't need to be used for these tests since they don't work in all browsers. > http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Mozilla/pageload-video.html > http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Mozilla/pageload-image.html cc:ing Michael Ventnor. Given that iframes are part of the HTML5 specification, I don't see why they shouldn't be used. > Minor you should add a pointer to the spec for this case (http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#handler-onload). > http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Mozilla/body-onload.html cc:ing Ms2ger (but not bzbarsky) -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 15:18:28 UTC