- From: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:57:24 +0000
- To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-html-testsuite@w3.org" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>, "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>
To start you should push the attribute tests in Hg rather than your server, this would be a good way to start to get the tests approved. Also if anyone has feedback on these tests please send feedback to the list. -----Original Message----- From: simetrical@gmail.com [mailto:simetrical@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Aryeh Gregor Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2011 10:28 AM To: L. David Baron Cc: James Graham; Kris Krueger; Anne van Kesteren; public-html-testsuite@w3.org; Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc) Subject: Re: Automated Test Runner On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:03 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > Why is inclusion in the test suite being gated on a review process? > I thought we agreed during the testing discussion at TPAC in November > that it wouldn't be. > > I think a model where tests are included when their author thinks > they're ready, and then others can challenge them, works much better > than one gated on reviews for all tests. I agree with that, but it doesn't seem to have been the status quo as of when I joined the Testing TF. Maybe someone who's been here longer can clarify the history and rationale.
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2011 03:02:13 UTC