- From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:17:51 +0200
- To: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-html-testsuite@w3.org" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>
On 04/04/2011 05:43 PM, Philip Taylor wrote: > Ms2ger wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12142 >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/rev/eb60791dc704 > > How does this case interact with the overload resolution algorithm? I > don't understand WebIDL at all, but in > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#dfn-overload-resolution-algorithm > it sounds like an argument with ECMAScript value 'undefined' would not > add object types into the 'types' set, and so it wouldn't match any of > the drawImage overloads (which all expect some object type as their > first argument) and should trigger a TypeError. (It'll never reach the > stage of converting the ES value 'undefined' into an IDL value 'null', > since it never gets far enough to pick a function to convert the > argument list for). (I could be completely misunderstanding everything, > though.) Cameron agrees with you, so I'm going to assume you're right and I'm wrong. I reverted my change. (He said that the spec is subject to change, though, but we can handle that once it happens.) > The changes to the other tests look fine to me. Thanks. -- Ms2ger
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 22:18:28 UTC