- From: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:17:12 +0000
- To: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, "'public-html-testsuite@w3.org' (public-html-testsuite@w3.org)" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>, "plh@w3.org" <plh@w3.org>, "bertails@w3.org" <bertails@w3.org>, "sysreq@w3.org" <sysreq@w3.org>
- CC: "Boris Zbarsky (bzbarsky@MIT.EDU)" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
I just tried push these files to Hg and the 'HTTP Error 500' has gone away. -Kris From: public-html-testsuite-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-testsuite-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kris Krueger Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 9:32 PM To: 'public-html-testsuite@w3.org' (public-html-testsuite@w3.org); plh@w3.org; bertails@w3.org; sysreq@w3.org Cc: Boris Zbarsky (bzbarsky@MIT.EDU) Subject: RE: video_008.htm and video_006.htm Apologies to anyone that has reviewed the update to video_008.htm. Currently video_008.htm has the exact contents of video_006.htm. Sorry I just don't use xterms+csh's very often and botched a cp command. I have attempted to update this file, though when I push the fix I get server 500 error. My freebsd xterm - keeps failing with the following. abort: HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error Philippe/Alexandre can fix this hg push issue? I suspect recycling the https server would fix this issue. -Thx! From: Kris Krueger Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 4:00 PM To: 'public-html-testsuite@w3.org' (public-html-testsuite@w3.org) Cc: Boris Zbarsky (bzbarsky@MIT.EDU) Subject: video_008.htm and video_006.htm I opened a new bugzilla bug #10632 to track updating the approved test case 'video_008.htm'. http://test.w3.org/html/tests/approved/video/video_008.htm http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10632 I believe it is incorrect and have updated this test with a correction. See http://test.w3.org/html/tests/submission/Microsoft/video/video_008.htm Additionally I have updated video_006.htm as well so that it can be approved. http://test.w3.org/html/tests/submission/Microsoft/video/video_006.htm At our next conference call (9/21/2010) we can discuss if indeed these tests are now correct per the HTML5 spec. -Kris
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 2010 14:18:34 UTC