- From: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:46:54 +0100
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "'public-html-testsuite@w3.org' (public-html-testsuite@w3.org)" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>, Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
James Graham wrote: > On 10/05/2010 10:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> [...] >> As for the others, are they not covered by Philip's test suite? That >> seems a much better place as that is also automated whereas these are >> not. > > Indeed. It is important to us, and will eventually be important to the > progress of the spec, that tests are suitable for simple automation. I'm happy to update my tests to cover issues they don't cover already, to avoid the need for manual tests. Looks like the new cases here are 'ex' font sizes, and SVG in drawImage. > http://test.w3.org/html/tests/submission/Microsoft/canvas/canvas_images_drawImage_001.htm > > Not automated, and no justification given. Also it assumes the browser supports SVG in <img>, which doesn't seem reasonable yet. (I think it's only safe to assume PNG, JPEG, GIF, and animated GIF). It should probably be designed so that it will pass in a browser that doesn't implement SVG in <img>, and fail only if it does support in <img> but not in drawImage. -- Philip Taylor pjt47@cam.ac.uk
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2010 13:47:54 UTC