- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:11:58 +0100
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>, "'public-html-testsuite@w3.org'" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>
Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 00:10 +0000, Kris Krueger wrote: >> >From my understanding of source options CVS is the only one in place today >> and available from the w3c. If the w3c has other options that are supported >> by their systems team, I'm open to switching at some point in the future. >> >> Maybe Mike or Philippe could comment? > > Our systeam folks are working on setting a git server, which we could > use as soon as mid-December. However, they're still arguing between git > and mercurial... Sounds good either way*. I suggest waiting until this is available before we start checking anything in to W3C space; there is no real need to create unnecessary migration pain later. *OK I confess to a slight pro-mercurial prejudice since it seems easier to use, but either would be a great improvement over CVS
Received on Monday, 23 November 2009 18:11:06 UTC