Friday, 31 May 2013
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
Thursday, 30 May 2013
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- RE: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
Tuesday, 28 May 2013
- {minutes} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-28 - MSE bugs discussion
- [eme] Update to editor's draft for bugs 21155 and 21569
Saturday, 25 May 2013
Thursday, 23 May 2013
- [VER 2] {agenda} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-28 - MSE status and bug discussion
- {agenda} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-28 - EME status and bug discussion
- [Bug 22148] New: Request that we reconsider adding jitter to video quality metrics
Wednesday, 22 May 2013
- [Bug 22143] New: MediaPlaybackQuality interface should limited to HTML5VideoElement
- [Bug 22139] New: MSE and ISOBMFF interoperability
- [Bug 22138] New: Frame removal
- [Bug 22137] New: changes in number of audio tracks during advert insertion
- [Bug 22136] New: Inband Storage for SPS/PPS in ISO BMFF
- [Bug 22135] New: Changing Source Buffers
- [Bug 22134] New: When do multiple SourceBuffers have to be used
Tuesday, 21 May 2013
- [Bug 22125] New: SourceBuffer.remove() should trigger ended -> open transition
- RE: {minutes} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-21 - EME status and bug discussion
- [Bug 22120] New: Variable Frame Rate
- [Bug 22117] New: Add a conformance section
- [Bug 22116] New: AppendWindowEnd behavior
- [Bug 22115] New: Consistency in loop processing
- [Bug 22113] New: Miscellaneous typos
- [Bug 22112] New: Merge appendBuffer and appendStream text
- [Bug 22111] New: End of stream and playback
- [Bug 22110] New: Javascript decoding data
- [Bug 22109] New: Use of the word sequence
Friday, 17 May 2013
- [EME] bug action items
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
Thursday, 16 May 2013
- [Bug 22065] New: Loop in 3.5.7 Coded Frame Processing
- {agenda} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-21 - EME status and bug discussion
- FW: [Bug 22062] New: Help filing bugs
- [Bug 22062] New: Help filing bugs
Wednesday, 15 May 2013
- [Bug 22052] New: Report statistics on errored video frames
- Re: I strongly urge all supporters to reconsider the EME proposal. It is not in your best interests!
- Re: I strongly urge all supporters to reconsider the EME proposal. It is not in your best interests!
- Re: I strongly urge all supporters to reconsider the EME proposal. It is not in your best interests!
- RE: I strongly urge all supporters to reconsider the EME proposal. It is not in your best interests!
- Re: I strongly urge all supporters to reconsider the EME proposal. It is not in your best interests!
- Re: I strongly urge all supporters to reconsider the EME proposal. It is not in your best interests!
- I strongly urge all supporters to reconsider the EME proposal. It is not in your best interests!
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
- [Bug 22035] New: The "removetrack" and "addtrack" events are out of sync with their HTML5 media definitions
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: {minutes} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-14 - MSE and EME bug discussions
- {minutes} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-14 - MSE and EME bug discussions
- Re: [MSE] New Proposal for Bug 20901
- [VER 2] {agenda} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-14 - MSE and EME status and bug discussion
- Re: [MSE] New Proposal for Bug 20901
- Re: [MSE] New Proposal for Bug 20901
- Re: ACTION-11: availability of protected media through JS APIs
Monday, 13 May 2013
- Re: Please, reject the EME proposal
- Re: Please, reject the EME proposal
- Re: Clarification
- [MSE] Spec Updates Published
- Re: Clarification
- RE: Please, reject the EME proposal
- Clarification
- {minutes} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-07 - EME bug discussion
- RE: Please, reject the EME proposal
- Re: Please, reject the EME proposal
- ACTION-11: availability of protected media through JS APIs
- Re: Please, reject the EME proposal
- RE: Please, reject the EME proposal
- Re: Please, reject the EME proposal
- Re: EME
- EME
- Re: Please, reject the EME proposal
- RE: Please, reject the EME proposal
- RE: Please, reject the EME proposal
- RE: Please, reject the EME proposal
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- RE: EME
- RE: Please, reject the EME proposal
- RE: Please reject EME.
- Re: Key distribution
- RE: Language
- Re: EME
- {agenda} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-14 - MSE and EME status and bug discussion
- Re: Please, reject the EME proposal
- Re: Please, reject the EME proposal
- Re: EME
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: Key distribution
Friday, 10 May 2013
Sunday, 12 May 2013
Monday, 13 May 2013
Friday, 10 May 2013
- Re: Key distribution
- Re: Key distribution
- RE: Key distribution
- Re: Key distribution
- Re: Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
Thursday, 9 May 2013
- Re: Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
- Re: The role of MP4 pssh boxes in EME
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
- [Bug 21977] New: Swap isTypeSupported() parameter order so keySystem is first
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: The role of MP4 pssh boxes in EME
- The role of MP4 pssh boxes in EME
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
Tuesday, 7 May 2013
- [Bug 21954] New: SourceBuffer AppendStream should have restrictions on MaxSize attribute
- [Bug 21953] New: AppendWindowEnd can accept NaN as value
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- Re: EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- RE: {agenda} HTML WG media telecon 2013-05-07 - EME bug discussion
- EME compatibility with existing DRM systems
- [EME] spec updates published
Monday, 6 May 2013
Friday, 3 May 2013
- RE: [MSE] New Proposal for Bug 20901
- Re: [MSE] New Proposal for Bug 20901
- Re: [MSE] New Proposal for Bug 20901
- [EME] bugs for discussion at the 5/7 telecon
Thursday, 2 May 2013
- [Bug 21911] New: MediaPlaybackQuality.creationDate should be a DOMHighResTimeStamp
- Re: [MSE] New Proposal for Bug 20901