- From: Gregory Woodhouse <gregory.woodhouse@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:00:46 -0700
- To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@oryx.com>
- Cc: public-html-mail@w3.org
- Message-Id: <34747CE0-80F7-4F77-8B6F-FAC7B61F2D75@sbcglobal.net>
On Mar 12, 2007, at 5:34 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > > Gregory Woodhouse writes: >> Now, that's interesting: Are web-based e-mail applications (which >> are increasingly common) really distinguishable from other web- >> based applications? I don't see how they could be. > > They are distinguished by having to display HTML/CSS email received > from spammers, phishers and other fellow citizens. Many other web- > based applications have no comparable threat. > > But now that you say it, I suppose a malevolent email message could > impersonate some other UIs, not only webmail UIs. > > Arnt > Yes, but what I had in mind is that a web-based e-mail application is just a web-based application, so there is no (non-voluntary) means of restricting just those applications. i suppose that leaves the unfortunate option of restricting he content of e-mail. Now, that's been tried before (with rich text), without much (if any) success. At least one reason why is obvious: If a small subset of HTML is crystallized as part of the standard, it will rapidly fall behind the rest of HTML. I don't see how we can realistically say that mechanisms like stylesheets cannot be used when what users want is improved presentation (and yes, the ability to hyperlink to other documents). Gregory Woodhouse gregory.woodhouse@sbcglobal.net "We may with advantage at times forget what we know." --Publilius Cyrus, c. 100 B.C.
Received on Monday, 12 March 2007 19:16:48 UTC