- From: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:30:27 -0500
- To: John Hax <johnhax@gmail.com>
- Cc: (wrong string) 興趣小組 <public-html-ig-zh@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADJvFOXtcJCCS-BX62QD=-v2=+BFK2UDR6FyFdnbCjXuyf2gtQ@mail.gmail.com>
答案是「是」的。事實上每次提出「但@是錯誤的行為呀」時都會吵一段時間,然後他們就拿出什麼「投影出來你怎樣計算絶對長度,PowerPoint你怎樣計算絶對長度」等的「理據」。 如果你想再次反對一下也好(至少告訴他們一般人是會反對@個的),但反對應該會是無效的…… 2012/2/6 John Hax <johnhax@gmail.com> > 此draft里提到“the 1:96 fixed ratio of CSS ‘in’ to CSS ‘px’”。我知道现在移动浏览器都是如此,导致绝对长度如in/cm等都不绝对了。但是这不是一个错误的行为吗?难道CSS > WG打算把这个错误行为标准化吗?我怎么想都觉得这样无法自圆其说啊。 > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@w3.org>wrote: > >> ** >> css3-images 的最後草案(Last Call)會在大約 36 個小時候(禮拜三中午,不過時間也不會計較的那麼細)截止,在@段時間內寄到 >> www-style 的任何意見,原則上 CSS >> 工作組*都會有回應*。@份規範有的新功能都列在下面了,其中漸層的語法好像吵了非常久了,所以要在最後送點意見的不妨試試。 >> >> 我到昨天為止都還沒認真讀過@份規範,今天看了一下,目前看到兩個有疑問的地方,今天下午再跟大家分享一下,歡迎大家在@ 36 >> 小時內多看看、想想@份規範。 >> >> >> 此致 >> >> Kenny >> >> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [css3-images] Last Call >> Working Draft of CSS Images Values and Replaced Content Level 3 Resent-Date: >> Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:47:17 +0000 Resent-From: www-style@w3.org Date: Fri, >> 13 Jan 2012 14:46:38 -0800 From: fantasai >> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> To: >> www-style@w3.org <www-style@w3.org> <www-style@w3.org> >> >> The CSS WG published a Last Call Working Draft of the CSS3 Images module: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-images-20120112/ >> >> This module covers: >> - CSS gradients >> - using media fragments (image slices) in CSS >> - ltr/rtl annotations to images for automatic flipping >> - fallback URLs for images, for gracefully handling unsupported image types >> - element() notation for using an elements' graphical representation as an image >> - CSS <-> image size negotiation >> - 'object-fit' and 'object-position' for controlling aspect ratio preservation >> - 'image-resolution' for using custom or intrinsic image resolutions >> - 'image-orientation' to correct misoriented images >> >> There are no significant changes since the last Working Draft (published in December). >> A summary of major changes to gradients over the past year is available here: >> http://www.w3.org/blog/CSS/2011/12/28/css3-images-pre-lc/ >> >> If you have comments on any part of the draft, please, send them here, to the<www-style@w3.org> <www-style@w3.org> mailing list. Please *start a new thread for each issue* >> and include [css3-images] in the subject line, as I did on this message. >> >> The deadline for comments is 7 February 2012. Please let us know if you need >> an extension so that we don't miss your comments. >> >> Thanks~ >> >> ~fantasai >> >> >> >> > -- cheers, -ambrose <http://gniw.ca>
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 16:36:44 UTC