- From: John Hax <johnhax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:04:20 +0800
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@w3.org>
- Cc: (wrong string) 興趣小組 <public-html-ig-zh@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 13 April 2012 11:04:52 UTC
补充一下,目前浏览器并没有一个实现cycle的,因此像ul样式到3级以下都是同样的了,即使手动做出循环效果,效果上反而接近方案B。从这个角度说,cycle的第二个例子其实改变了浏览器的样式,所以我不确定这是否是一个合格的use case。也许草案应该抛弃这个例子?
Received on Friday, 13 April 2012 11:04:52 UTC