Re: 代辦事項的整理

2010/9/8 KangHao Lu (Kenny) <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>:

不好意思，先簡單回一下。

> 2. Ignoring groups that have the value zero, append the second group marker
> to the second group, the third group marker to the third group, and the
> fourth
西文數字三位一撇，中文是四位一組。光是這個西方人就弄不清楚了。

> 3. For each group, ignoring digits that have the value zero, append the
> second
類似電話之類的數字或號碼，有使用〇的話，重複的不會省略。

> 4. For any group with a value less than 20, remove the second digit (the 1
> in
印象中，中文跟日文這裡不一樣，要確認。

> 6. Collapse any consecutive runs of 0 digits to a single 0.

> 7. Replace each digit with the relevant character selected from the
> numbering
> system's table.
>
> 我自己是覺得4.有點怪怪的，但是也不很肯定。
> 四萬零十一？四萬零一十一？哪個對呢？
我也不確定。

> formal跟informal的不一樣嗎？
> 希望有Firefox跟Office的測試一下
就firefox的實作，兩者是"大寫數字"跟"小寫數字"的差別。
(formal: 壹~玖; informal: 一~九)

http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87%E6%95%B8%E5%AD%97


-- 
Best regards,
Yuan Chao



2010/9/8 KangHao Lu (Kenny) <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>:
> 哈囉
>
> Japanese Layout Task Force的領頭小林龍生希望把這個工作組擴充成CJK Layout Task
>
> Force，我想你會有興趣，另外台灣大陸的W3C會員也是很少。
>
> 我看了一下，竟然台灣沒有相關單位在W3C裡面。
>
> 是啊，不過也是跟我們的產業很有關係吧。其實有一個啦，就是工研院，不過他們完全沒參加任何W3C的活動，我現在的立場是希望讓已經有辦法拿W3C帳號的台灣人先多參與一些W3C的活動。不過光是這點恐怕也是很難、、、
> 我可以請你帶大家討論一下CSS3 Lists
> CJK數字轉文字演算法的對錯嗎？工作項目是 http://public-html-ig-zh.wikidot.com/action-list
> 的「檢討Seiichi Kato寫的CJK數字文字化演算法勘誤表的中文部份，遞交與現今《CSS3 Lists Editors Draft》的差異」
> 我看了一下Seiichi Kato寫的：
> 1. Split the decimal number into groups of four digits, starting with the
> least
> significant digit.
> 2. Ignoring groups that have the value zero, append the second group marker
> to the second group, the third group marker to the third group, and the
> fourth
> group marker to the fourth group. These markers are defined in the tables
> for
> the specific numbering systems. The first group has no marker.
> 3. For each group, ignoring digits that have the value zero, append the
> second
> digit marker to the second digit, the third digit marker to the third digit,
> and
> the fourth digit marker to the fourth digit. These markers are defined in
> the
> tables for the specific numbering systems. The first digit has no marker.
> 4. For any group with a value less than 20, remove the second digit (the 1
> in
> the tens column). Leave any associated markers.  This is applicable to
> informal lists only.  For formal lists, do not remove the second digit even
> with a value less than 20.
> 5. Concatenate the groups back into a single string, least significant group
> last.
> 6. Collapse any consecutive runs of 0 digits to a single 0.
> 7. Replace each digit with the relevant character selected from the
> numbering
> system's table.
>
> 我自己是覺得4.有點怪怪的，但是也不很肯定。
> 四萬零十一？四萬零一十一？哪個對呢？
> formal跟informal的不一樣嗎？
> 希望有Firefox跟Office的測試一下
>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Yuan Chao

Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 11:06:28 UTC