- From: Jung Taeyoung <master@mytears.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:19:49 +0900
- To: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@w3.org>
- Cc: HTML Korean Interest Group <public-html-ig-ko@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <69311079-B31F-418E-96CE-51800CB8736B@mytears.org>
2011. 1. 19., ¿ÀÈÄ 11:57, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu ÀÛ¼º: > 3. > "word-break:keep-all" seems to be used quite often in Korean, to disallow breaks in a series of Hangul not separated by white spaces. What should happen when "word-break:keep-all" is applied with "word-wrap: normal"[8]? (word-wrap is a property that triggers "emergency wrapping" and normal is its default value) I do not agree with that '"word-break: keep-all" seems to be used quite often in Korean'. As I know except series of numbers, every word can be split in Korean text. In my opinion 'word-break: keep-all' will not be so helpful for Korean. For example '¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä' can be split but '123456' should not be split. Anyway I think these options can be used for overriding default behavior. (I don't know whether I understand correctly, as in my understanding the value 'normal' acts like 'keep-all' for some languages such as English and for the other languages the behavior of 'normal' is same as the behavior of 'break-all'.) > > For example, if you apply "word-break:keep-all" to, say, "¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä" and then shrink the window until the window is smaller than "¾È³çÇϼ¼ ¿ä". Should "¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä" be split? I haven't tried it myself but you are encouraged to do some experiments. > I think it should be split. (It's just my opinion) > Notice that the current draft says yes but previous version[9] said no. > > [8] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#word-wrap > [9] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/csswg/css3-text/Overview.html?rev=1.17&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1#word-wrap0 > > Regards.
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 04:20:25 UTC