RE: Rechartering Device APIs & Policy Working Group

안녕하세요. 김병정 그룹장님.
좋은 정보 감사합니다~

Rechartering이 최종적으로 어떻게 될지 궁금하네요~ ;)

이원석 드림.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-html-ig-ko-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-ig-ko-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Byungjung Kim
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:31 AM
> To: public-html-ig-ko@w3.org
> Subject: FW: Rechartering Device APIs & Policy Working Group
> 
> FYI
> 
> The most important change :
> - removal of the Policy Framework
> - rename the group to "Device APIs Working Group
> - tightens the scope of our
> 
> diff between the two versions of the charter at:
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2009%

> 2F05%2FDeviceAPICharter&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2010%2F11%
> 2FDeviceAPICharter.html
> 
> Best Regards
> Byungjung Kim(BJ) @obigo, from London.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dominique Hazael-Massieux
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 11:10 PM
> To: public-device-apis
> Subject: Rechartering Device APIs & Policy Working Group
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The current charter [1] of our Working Group will expire at the end of
> June this year; it is pretty clear that our work will not be done by
> then and thus will need to extend or renew our charter.
> 
> Given that our understanding of the work that needs to be done has
> evolved quite a bit, and also due to the lack of involvement of
> potential implementors of our work in the group, the Chairs and Staff
> Contacts are suggesting that we should try to refine our charter and
> have it reviewed by W3C Advisory Committee.
> 
> To that end, I've been working on a proposed new charter for the group:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/11/DeviceAPICharter.html

> 
> This charter introduces several important changes — which are all up for
> discussion.
> 
> The most important change is the removal of the Policy Framework as a
> deliverable of the group. That proposed change is motivated by the
> following reasons:
> * the work has only had limited traction in the group so far,
> * the policy framework is architecturally independent of the APIs, while
> its bundling with our work on APIs has been the source of
> misunderstandings from potential implementors.
> 
> To reflect the removal of the said framework, we're proposing to rename
> the group to "Device APIs Working Group" — although the group would
> still be referred as DAP since that's now a well-known moniker.
> 
> The removal of the Policy Framework doesn't mean that the group would
> stop working on security. On the contrary, the new charter puts a strong
> emphasis on the needs surrounding security and privacy (privacy which
> was actually missing from the previous charter.) We've already received
> feedback that the current wording around security isn't satisfying and
> welcome proposed changes to the text.
> 
> Finally, the new charter tightens the scope of our APIs to reflect the
> ones we've actually been working on — the very broad scope of our
> current charter has been an explicit showstopper for some W3C Members to
> join the group.
> 
> You can see a diff between the two versions of the charter at:
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2009%

> 2F05%2FDeviceAPICharter&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2010%2F11%
> 2FDeviceAPICharter.html
> 
> We very much welcome feedback and suggestions on this new charter, which
> will also be discussed during our F2F in Seoul.
> 
> Dom
> 
> 1. http://www.w3.org/2009/05/DeviceAPICharter

> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 05:20:52 UTC