- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 15:52:04 -0400
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
hixie: Move slightly more towards using the word 'type' rather than
'name' for the concept of an event name (whatwg r7099)
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html?r1=1.5655&r2=1.5656&f=h
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7098&to=7099
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5655
retrieving revision 1.5656
diff -u -d -r1.5655 -r1.5656
--- Overview.html 8 May 2012 17:22:05 -0000 1.5655
+++ Overview.html 8 May 2012 19:51:51 -0000 1.5656
@@ -3779,7 +3779,10 @@
<li><dfn id="event-click" title="event-click"><code>click</code></dfn> event</li>
- </ul><p>In addition, user agents must implement the features defined in
+ </ul><p>This specification sometimes uses the term <dfn title="">name</dfn> to refer to the event's <code title="dom-event-type">type</code>; as in, "an event named <code title="">click</code>" or "if the event name is <code title="">keypress</code>". The terms "name" and "type" for events
+ are synonymous.</p>
+
+ <p>In addition, user agents must implement the features defined in
the DOM Parsing and Serialization specification, HTML
Editing APIs, and UndoManager and DOM Transaction specifications
that apply to their conformance class.
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:52:07 UTC