- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:55:13 -0500
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
hixie: Change what was non-normatively implied to be proleptic UTC to explicitly and normatively be proleptic UT1. (whatwg r5913) http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html?r1=1.4752&r2=1.4753&f=h http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5912&to=5913 =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v retrieving revision 1.4752 retrieving revision 1.4753 diff -u -d -r1.4752 -r1.4753 --- Overview.html 25 Feb 2011 07:13:13 -0000 1.4752 +++ Overview.html 25 Feb 2011 07:53:04 -0000 1.4753 @@ -4479,16 +4479,23 @@ </ol><p class="note">This format allows for time-zone offsets from -23:59 to +23:59. In practice, however, the range of offsets of actual time zones is -12:00 to +14:00, and the minutes component of offsets of - actual time zones is always either 00, 30, or 45.<div class="example"> + actual time zones is always either 00, 30, or 45.<p>Times in dates before the formation of UTC in the mid twentieth + century must be expressed and interpreted in terms of UT1 + (contemporary Earth solar time at the 0° longitude), not UTC + (the approximation of UT1 that ticks in SI seconds). Time before the + formation of time zones must be expressed and interpeted as UT1 + times with explicit time zones that approximate the contemporary + difference between the appropriate local time and the time observed + at the location of Greenwich, London.<div class="example"> <p>The following are some examples of dates written as <a href="#valid-global-date-and-time-string" title="valid global date and time string">valid global date and time strings</a>.</p> <dl><dt>"<code>0037-12-13T00:00Z</code>"</dt> - <dd>Midnight UTC on the birthday of Nero (the Roman Emperor). See - below for further discussion on which date this actually - corresponds to.</dd> + <dd>Midnight in areas using London time on the birthday of Nero + (the Roman Emperor). See below for further discussion on which + date this actually corresponds to.</dd> <dt>"<code>1979-10-14T12:00:00.001-04:00</code>"</dt> @@ -4509,21 +4516,27 @@ zero-padded. The date "37-12-13" would not be a valid date.</li> <li>To unambiguously identify a moment in time prior to the - introduction of the Gregorian calendar, the date has to be first - converted to the Gregorian calendar from the calendar in use at - the time (e.g. from the Julian calendar). The date of Nero's birth - is the 15th of December 37, in the Julian Calendar, which is the - 13th of December 37 in the proleptic Gregorian Calendar.</li> <!-- - This might not be true. I can't find a reference that gives his - birthday with an explicit statement about the calendar being - used. However, it seems unlikely that it would be given in the - Gregorian calendar, so I assume sites use the Julian one. --> + introduction of the Gregorian calendar (insofar as moments in time + before the formation of UTC can be unambiguously identified), the + date has to be first converted to the Gregorian calendar from the + calendar in use at the time (e.g. from the Julian calendar). The + date of Nero's birth is the 15th of December 37, in the Julian + Calendar, which is the 13th of December 37 in the proleptic + Gregorian Calendar.</li> <!-- This might not be true. I can't find + a reference that gives his birthday with an explicit statement + about the calendar being used. However, it seems unlikely that it + would be given in the Gregorian calendar, so I assume sites use + the Julian one. --> <li>The time and time-zone offset components are not optional.</li> <li>Dates before the year one can't be represented as a datetime in this version of HTML.</li> + <li>Times of specific events in ancient times are, at best, + approximations, since time was not well coordinated or measured + until relatively recent decades.</li> + <li>Time-zone offsets differ based on daylight savings time.</li> </ul></div><div class="impl">
Received on Friday, 25 February 2011 07:55:15 UTC