- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:46:12 +0900 (JST)
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
mjs: Record straw polls for issues 4, 84, 101.
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/status/issue-status.html?r1=1.219&r2=1.220&f=h
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/status/issue-status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.219
retrieving revision 1.220
diff -u -d -r1.219 -r1.220
--- issue-status.html 22 Jul 2010 15:48:03 -0000 1.219
+++ issue-status.html 27 Jul 2010 23:43:12 -0000 1.220
@@ -84,16 +84,18 @@
</tr>
-->
+
<tr><td id="ISSUE-004"><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/4">ISSUE-4</a>
html-versioning <a href="#ISSUE-004" title="Link to this entry">#</a></td>
<td>none</td>
- <td>Review Change Proposals</td>
- <td>n/a</td>
- <td>Chairs</td>
+ <td>Respond to Straw Poll</td>
+ <td><time datetime="2010-07-30">Jul 30, 2010</time></td>
+ <td>Working Group</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Allow much more general DOCTYPE syntax to be conforming, possibly including optional version information.</a></strong>
(Same Change Proposal also covers ISSUE-84)<hr>
<strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0718.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Do not put a version indicator in the
- DOCTYPE.</a></strong>
+ DOCTYPE.</a></strong><hr>
+ <strong><a href="http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-4-84-objection-poll/results">Straw Poll for Objections</a></strong>
</td>
</tr>
@@ -441,9 +443,9 @@
<tr><td id="ISSUE-084"><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/84">ISSUE-84</a>
legacy-doctypes <a href="#ISSUE-084" title="Link to this entry">#</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7727">bug 7727</a></td>
- <td>Review Change Proposals</td>
- <td>n/a</td>
- <td>Chairs</td>
+ <td>Respond to Straw Poll</td>
+ <td><time datetime="2010-07-30">Jul 30, 2010</time></td>
+ <td>Working Group</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0000.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Allow much more general DOCTYPE syntax to be conforming, possibly including optional version information.</a></strong><br>
(Same Change Proposal also covers ISSUE-4)<br>
Request for <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0032.html">revision to satisfy Change Proposal requirements.</a><br>
@@ -451,6 +453,8 @@
Further review comments <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0236.html">here</a><br>
Comments addressed.<hr>
<strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0718.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Do not put a version indicator in the DOCTYPE.</a></strong>
+<hr>
+ <strong><a href="http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-4-84-objection-poll/results">Straw Poll for Objections</a></strong>
</td>
</tr>
@@ -679,13 +683,15 @@
us-ascii-ref <a href="#ISSUE-0101" title="Link to this entry">#</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8845">bug 8845</a>
</td>
- <td>Review Change Proposals</td>
- <td>n/a</td>
- <td>Chairs</td>
+ <td>Respond to Straw Poll</td>
+ <td><time datetime="2010-07-30">Jul 30, 2010</time></td>
+ <td>Working Group</td>
<td>
<strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0084.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Change ASCII reference to point to ISO standard</a></strong><hr>
<strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0559.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> No change; retain link to free of charge reference for ASCII</a></strong><hr>
<strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0602.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Replace HTML5's current ASCII reference with a link to ECMA-6's homepage</a></strong>
+<hr>
+ <strong><a href="http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-101-objection-poll/results">Straw Poll for Objections</a></strong>
</td>
</tr>
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2010 23:44:00 UTC