- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:34:40 +0900 (JST)
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
hixie: Remove the rule that says you can use the heading of a secton as the caption of an image that otherwise lacks alternative text. (whatwg r5026) http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html?r1=1.4041&r2=1.4042&f=h http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5025&to=5026 =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v retrieving revision 1.4041 retrieving revision 1.4042 diff -u -d -r1.4041 -r1.4042 --- Overview.html 13 Apr 2010 08:31:53 -0000 1.4041 +++ Overview.html 13 Apr 2010 08:34:25 -0000 1.4042 @@ -17774,12 +17774,6 @@ contains content other than <a href="#inter-element-whitespace">inter-element whitespace</a>.</li> - <li>The <code><a href="#the-img-element">img</a></code> element is part of the only - <a href="#paragraph">paragraph</a> directly in its <a href="#concept-section" title="concept-section">section</a>, and is the only - <code><a href="#the-img-element">img</a></code> element without an <code title="attr-img-alt"><a href="#attr-img-alt">alt</a></code> attribute in its section, and its - <a href="#concept-section" title="concept-section">section</a> has an associated - heading.</li> - </ul><p class="note">Such cases are to be kept to an absolute minimum. If there is even the slightest possibility of the author having the ability to provide real alternative text, then it would @@ -17789,23 +17783,17 @@ <div class="example"> <p>A photo on a photo-sharing site, if the site received the - image with no metadata other than the caption:</p> + image with no metadata other than the caption, could be marked up + as follows:</p> <pre><figure> <strong><img src="1100670787_6a7c664aef.jpg"></strong> <figcaption>Bubbles traveled everywhere with us.</figcaption> </figure></pre> - <p>It could also be marked up like this:</p> - - <pre><article> - <h1>Bubbles traveled everywhere with us.</h1> - <strong><img src="1100670787_6a7c664aef.jpg"></strong> -</article></pre> - - <p>In either case, though, it would be better if a detailed - description of the important parts of the image obtained from the - user and included on the page.</p> + <p>It would be better, however, if a detailed description of the + important parts of the image obtained from the user and included + on the page.</p> </div> @@ -17974,14 +17962,8 @@ contains content other than <a href="#inter-element-whitespace">inter-element whitespace</a> (as <a href="#unknown-images">described above</a>).</li> - <li>The <code><a href="#the-img-element">img</a></code> element is part of the only - <a href="#paragraph">paragraph</a> directly in its <a href="#concept-section" title="concept-section">section</a>, and is the only - <code><a href="#the-img-element">img</a></code> element without an <code title="attr-img-alt"><a href="#attr-img-alt">alt</a></code> attribute in its section, and its - <a href="#concept-section" title="concept-section">section</a> has an associated - heading (as <a href="#unknown-images">described above</a>).</li> - <!-- the following are additional entries not included in the - aforementioned list, as they apply only to --> + aforementioned list, as they apply only to conformance checkers --> <li>The conformance checker has been configured to assume that the document is an e-mail or document intended for a specific person
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 08:35:08 UTC