- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:43:01 +0900 (JST)
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
hixie: Minor intro fixes. (whatwg r3899) http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html?r1=1.3060&r2=1.3061&f=h http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=3898&to=3899 =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v retrieving revision 1.3060 retrieving revision 1.3061 diff -u -d -r1.3060 -r1.3061 --- Overview.html 18 Sep 2009 08:40:32 -0000 1.3060 +++ Overview.html 18 Sep 2009 08:42:42 -0000 1.3061 @@ -1257,15 +1257,15 @@ serialization, and which was completed in 2000. After XHTML 1.0, the W3C's focus turned to making it easier for other working groups to extend XHTML, under the banner of XHTML Modularization. In parallel - with this, the W3C also worked on a new language that was no + with this, the W3C also worked on a new language that was not compatible with the earlier HTML and XHTML languages, calling it XHTML2.<p>Around the time that HTML's evolution was stopped in 1998, parts of the API for HTML developed by browsers were specified and - published under the name DOM Level 1 (in 1998) and DOM Core Level 2 - and DOM HTML Level 2 (starting in 2000 and culminating in + published under the name DOM Level 1 (in 1998) and DOM Level 2 Core + and DOM Level 2 HTML (starting in 2000 and culminating in 2003). These efforts then petered out, with some DOM Level 3 specifications published in 2004 but the working group being closed - before all the Level 3 drafts were published.<p>In 2003, the publication of XForms, a technology which was + before all the Level 3 drafts were completed.<p>In 2003, the publication of XForms, a technology which was positioned as the next generation of Web forms, sparked a renewed interest in evolving HTML itself, rather than finding replacements for it. This interest was borne from the realization that XML's
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 08:43:40 UTC