- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:50:13 +0900 (JST)
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
hixie: valueAsDate has to always return a new object, since the Date objects are mutable. (whatwg r3776) http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html?r1=1.2945&r2=1.2946&f=h http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=3775&to=3776 =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v retrieving revision 1.2945 retrieving revision 1.2946 diff -u -d -r1.2945 -r1.2946 --- Overview.html 9 Sep 2009 09:41:24 -0000 1.2945 +++ Overview.html 9 Sep 2009 09:49:53 -0000 1.2946 @@ -13583,7 +13583,7 @@ </dl><div> <p>The <dfn id="dom-time-valueasdate" title="dom-time-valueAsDate"><code>valueAsDate</code></dfn> IDL - attribute must return either null or a <code>Date</code> object + attribute must return either null or a new <code>Date</code> object initialised to the relevant value as defined by the following list:</p> @@ -13609,9 +13609,10 @@ <dd>The null value.</dd> - </dl><p>The same <code>Date</code> object must be returned until the - <code title="attr-time-datetime"><a href="#attr-time-datetime">datetime</a></code> attribute is - removed or changed.</p> + </dl><p>When a <code>Date</code> object is to be returned, a new one must + be constructed.</p> <!-- yes, this means .valueAsDate != + .valueAsDate, but the object is mutable, so it'd be weird if we + didn't do that --> </div><div class="example">
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2009 09:50:49 UTC