- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:46:11 +0900 (JST)
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
Updated or removed obsolete parts of Status of this Document.
Diffs for this change per section:
http://people.w3.org/mike/diffs/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.1.25.html#sotd
http://people.w3.org/mike/diffs/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.1.25.html#abstract
http://people.w3.org/mike/diffs/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.diff.html
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.html?r1=1.24&r2=1.25&f=h
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -d -r1.24 -r1.25
--- Overview.html 26 May 2009 07:36:24 -0000 1.24
+++ Overview.html 26 May 2009 07:45:49 -0000 1.25
@@ -84,35 +84,20 @@
can be found in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/">W3C technical reports
index</a> at http://www.w3.org/TR/.</em>
- <p>This document is the First Public Working Draft of "HTML Design
- Principles" produced by the <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/">HTML
- Working Group</a>, part of the <a
- href="http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Activity">HTML Activity</a>. The Working
- Group intends to publish this document as a <a
+ <p>This document is an Editor's Draft of "HTML Design Principles" produced
+ by the <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/">HTML Working Group</a>, part
+ of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Activity">HTML Activity</a>. The
+ Working Group intends to publish this document as a <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/#WGNote">Working Group
- Note</a>. The working group is working on a new version of HTML not yet
- published under TR. In the meantime, you can access the <a
- href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/">HTML 5 Editor's draft</a>.
- The appropriate forum for comments on this document is <a
+ Note</a>. The working group is working on a new version of HTML. The <a
+ href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/"> latest published Draft</a> and the <a
+ href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/">HTML 5 Editor's draft</a> are
+ available. The appropriate forum for comments on this document is <a
href="mailto:public-html-comments@w3.org">public-html-comments@w3.org</a>,
a mailing list with a <a
href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/"
title="Archive for HTML comments mailing-list">public archive</a>.
- <p>The decision to request publication of the document was based on a <a
- href="http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results">poll of the
- members of the HTML working group</a>, with the results being 51 "Yes"
- votes, 2 "No" votes, and 1 "Formally Object", vote.
-
- <p>The specific objection recorded was judged to fall under the category of
- a comment that can be addressed in future drafts — not a critical
- reason to delay publication, and with the understanding that full
- consensus is not a prerequisite to publication, because the decision of
- the HTML working group to publish the document reflects the intent of the
- group to signal to the community to begin carefully reviewing the
- document, and to encourage wide review of the document within and outside
- of W3C.
-
<p>Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C
Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or
obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this
Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -d -r1.24 -r1.25
--- Overview.src.html 26 May 2009 07:36:24 -0000 1.24
+++ Overview.src.html 26 May 2009 07:45:49 -0000 1.25
@@ -73,34 +73,19 @@
found in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/">W3C technical reports index</a>
at http://www.w3.org/TR/.</em></p>
- <p>This document is the First Public Working Draft of "HTML Design Principles"
+ <p>This document is an Editor's Draft of "HTML Design Principles"
produced by the <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/">HTML Working Group</a>, part of the
<a href="http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Activity">HTML Activity</a>. The Working
Group intends to publish this document as a
<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/#WGNote">Working Group
- Note</a>. The working group is working on a new version of HTML not yet
- published under TR. In the meantime, you can access the
- <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/">HTML 5 Editor's
- draft</a>. The appropriate forum for comments on this document is
+ Note</a>. The working group is working on a new version of HTML. The <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/">
+ latest published Draft</a> and the <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/">HTML 5 Editor's
+ draft</a> are available. The appropriate forum for comments on this document is
<a href="mailto:public-html-comments@w3.org">public-html-comments@w3.org</a>,
a mailing list with a
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/" title="Archive for HTML comments mailing-list">public
archive</a>.</p>
- <p>The decision to request publication of the document was based on a
- <a href="http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results">poll of the
- members of the HTML working group</a>, with the results being 51 "Yes"
- votes, 2 "No" votes, and 1 "Formally Object", vote.</p>
-
- <p>The specific objection recorded was judged to fall under the category
- of a comment that can be addressed in future drafts — not a
- critical reason to delay publication, and with the understanding that
- full consensus is not a prerequisite to publication, because the
- decision of the HTML working group to publish the document reflects the
- intent of the group to signal to the community to begin carefully
- reviewing the document, and to encourage wide review of the document
- within and outside of W3C.</p>
-
<p>Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C
Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or
obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 07:46:47 UTC