- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:57:19 +0900 (JST)
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
more xref fixes (whatwg r3285) http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html?r1=1.2431&r2=1.2432&f=h http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=3284&to=3285 =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v retrieving revision 1.2431 retrieving revision 1.2432 diff -u -d -r1.2431 -r1.2432 --- Overview.html 16 Jun 2009 19:55:16 -0000 1.2431 +++ Overview.html 16 Jun 2009 19:57:03 -0000 1.2432 @@ -15906,15 +15906,15 @@ <ol><li><p>If the element has a <code title="attr-embed-type"><a href="#attr-embed-type">type</a></code> attribute, and that attribute's value is a type that a <a href="#plugin">plugin</a> supports, then the value of the <code title="attr-embed-type"><a href="#attr-embed-type">type</a></code> attribute is the - <span>content's type</span>.</li> + <a href="#concept-embed-type" title="concept-embed-type">content's type</a>.</li> <li> <p>Otherwise, if the <a href="#url-path" title="url-path"><path></a> component of the <a href="#url">URL</a> of the specified resource (after any redirects) matches a pattern that a <a href="#plugin">plugin</a> - supports, then the <span>content's type</span> is the type that - that plugin can handle.</p> + supports, then the <a href="#concept-embed-type" title="concept-embed-type">content's + type</a> is the type that that plugin can handle.</p> <p class="example">For example, a plugin might say that it can handle resources with <a href="#url-path" title="url-path"><path></a> @@ -15925,7 +15925,8 @@ </li> <li><p>Otherwise, if the specified resource has <a href="#content-type" title="Content-Type">explicit Content-Type metadata</a>, then - that is the <span>content's type</span>.</li> + that is the <a href="#concept-embed-type" title="concept-embed-type">content's + type</a>.</li> <li><p>Otherwise, the content has no type and there can be no appropriate <a href="#plugin">plugin</a> for it.</li>
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 19:57:51 UTC