- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:54:39 +0100
- To: public-html-data-tf@w3.org
Hi, +1 short + pragmatic = usable ;) Cheers, Bo On 10/31/2011 10:37 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > In accordance with the WG resolution of last week[1], the Editor's draft of RDFa Lite 1.1[2] has been uploaded to the server (the 'working', ie, RecSpec version is in [3]). This should be published as a FPWD together with the rest of the RDFa 1.1 documents Working Drafts, when the last few remaining technical issues are solved. > > Note that RDFa 1.1 Lite does _not_ include a change in the behaviour of @property. In my view this is the way it should be (although I am not 100% sure this has been decided by the WG): this behaviour should be part of RDFa 1.1. Core, and not only for the Lite subset. Indeed, if it was part of Lite only, that would distort the important fact that the current Lite[2] is a strict subset of Core. (See, eg, [4], although the URI name is a misnomer, the feature is not Lite specific, or the discussion thread starting with [5]). > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-10-27#RDFa_Lite_1__2e_1_as_Editors_Draft__3f_ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2011/ED-rdfa-lite-20111030/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-lite/Overview-src.html > [4] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/RDFaLiteWithProperty > [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Oct/0107.html
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 11:55:19 UTC