Jeni, I have added a new issue to the RDFa tracker: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/113 Ivan On Oct 29, 2011, at 11:37 , Jeni Tennison wrote: > Hi, > > You may already be aware that Hixie has resolved the issue on replacing <time> with <data> [1] and made the relevant changes in the spec [2]. The new <data> element has a @value attribute which is used to provide the relevant microdata property value [3]. > > It would be great if it were possible for RDFa to also use the @value attribute on the <data> element to provide the machine-readable value for a property. (This is similar to rdfa-ISSUE-97, which is overtaken by events.) If it were, using <data> and the @value attribute would be an alternative to using the @content attribute in (X)HTML+RDFa, which perhaps could mean discouraging the use of @content in those formats. > > What would be the best way forward to address this? Would filing an HTML+RDFa bug be helpful? > > Thanks, > > Jeni > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240#c47 > [2] http://html5.org/r/6783 > [3] http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/Overview.html#values > -- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2011 10:03:40 UTC