W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-data-tf@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:27:16 +0100
Cc: Lin Clark <lin.w.clark@gmail.com>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html-data-tf@w3.org
Message-Id: <8C3622C3-D9FE-4ECA-A376-2A7331F75A69@deri.org>
To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
(I took public-html-data-tf off the cc list to avoid a bounce; feel free to forward if appropriate)

On 14 Oct 2011, at 12:33, Jeni Tennison wrote:
> What were the other patterns, out of interest?

There's really only two patterns. The key question is, given a type URL and a local property name, how do you derive the full property URL?

1. The schema.org or general RDF style: {base}{typename} => {base}{propname}

http://schema.org/Person => http://schema.org/name
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person => http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
http://rdfs.org/ns/void#Dataset => http://rdfs.org/ns/void#dataDump

2. The hash-property style: {base}{typename} => {base}{typename}#{propname}

http://ns.whatwg.org/work => http://ns.whatwg.org/work#license

For both cases there would have to be documentation that says, “a vocabulary can only be said to follow this pattern if no URL of such-and-such a shape is used for any other purpose except identifying the properties.”

Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 13:27:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:08:24 UTC