- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philip@foolip.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:22:55 +0200
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Evan Sandhaus <sandhes@nytimes.com>, "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>, public-html-data-tf@w3.org
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 21:23, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > Ted / Philip: Do you have any feeling about whether browsers might end up natively supporting the microdata vocabularies from the WHATWG HTML spec [2] (eg to give better integration with people's address books or calendars) or are they likely to support equivalent types/properties from the schema.org vocabulary, or do nothing natively with embedded data? Sure, I think that's entirely possible. At the very least I expect to see extensions that export to web-based calendars and contacts. In other words, the multiple types should be exposed via the DOM API, and we'll update our implementation to align with the spec when it changes. -- Philip Jägenstedt
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 06:23:44 UTC