Monday, 31 October 2011
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-1
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: FYI: W3C editor's draft for RDFa 1.1 Lite
- Re: FYI: W3C editor's draft for RDFa 1.1 Lite
- FYI: W3C editor's draft for RDFa 1.1 Lite
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-1
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE 2: Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE 2: Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values
- Re: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison
Sunday, 30 October 2011
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Fwd: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison
- Re: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison
- Re: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison
- Re: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Fwd: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
Saturday, 29 October 2011
- Fwd: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison
- Re: Updated Microdata to RDF draft
- Re: Updated Microdata to RDF draft
- Re: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison
- Re: Updated Microdata to RDF draft
- Re: Support for the <data> element
- Support for the <data> element
- Re: Updated Microdata to RDF draft
Friday, 28 October 2011
- htmldata-ISSUE-3 (Property-specific datatypes): Should the registry allow property datatype specification [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: Updated Microdata to RDF draft
- Re: Updated Microdata to RDF draft
- Updated Microdata to RDF draft
- Proposal to resolve ISSUE 2: Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values
- Proposal to resolve ISSUE-1
- Re: Language in schema.org
- Re: Language in schema.org
Thursday, 27 October 2011
- Re: Language in schema.org
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: Justifying breaking backward compatibility based on existing content (was Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel)
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: Mapping Microdata to RDF
- Re: Mapping Microdata to RDF
- Re: Mapping Microdata to RDF
- Re: Single heuristic mapping for property URIs
- Re: Single heuristic mapping for property URIs
- Single heuristic mapping for property URIs
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
- Re: Language in schema.org
- Re: Language in schema.org
- Re: Language in schema.org
- Re: Language in schema.org
- Language in schema.org
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: Justifying breaking backward compatibility based on existing content (was Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel)
- Justifying breaking backward compatibility based on existing content (was Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel)
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
- Re: Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
- Re: Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
Monday, 24 October 2011
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: Microdata itemid and src / href
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: Microdata itemid and src / href
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: Microdata itemid and src / href
- Re: Microdata itemid and src / href
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
Sunday, 23 October 2011
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
- Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel
Saturday, 22 October 2011
- Re: Microdata itemid and src / href
- Re: Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
- Re: Re-use of RDFa attributes to address some of the issues?
- Fwd: RDFa 1.1 Lite
- Re: Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
- Re: Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
Friday, 21 October 2011
- Re: Microdata itemid and src / href
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
- Re: Microdata itemid and src / href
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: Re-use of RDFa attributes to address some of the issues?
- Re: Inferring data type from a vocabulary or content
- Re: Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Straw Poll (ISSUE-1)
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: Microdata implied property order
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Microdata itemid and src / href
- Re-use of RDFa attributes to address some of the issues?
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: Microdata implied property order
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
Thursday, 20 October 2011
- Re: Microdata implied property order
- Re: Inferring data type from a vocabulary or content (ISSUE-2)
- htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Inferring data type from a vocabulary or content
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
Thursday, 20 October 2011
- Re: Microdata implied property order
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multi-Lingual Pages (ACTION-1)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Multi-Lingual Pages (ACTION-1)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
Tuesday, 18 October 2011
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Fwd: [research-all] Fwd: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- htmldata-ISSUE-1 (Microdata Vocabulary): Vocabulary specific parsing for Microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Use case for scripts using HTML data
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
Monday, 17 October 2011
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Draft response to ISSUE-105: @itemref support
- Re: Draft response to ISSUE-105: @itemref support
- Re: Draft response to ISSUE-105: @itemref support
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
Sunday, 16 October 2011
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Generating property URIs (Was: Re: URIs for properties at schema.org)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Generating property URIs (Was: Re: URIs for properties at schema.org)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
Saturday, 15 October 2011
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Generating property URIs (Was: Re: URIs for properties at schema.org)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Generating property URIs (Was: Re: URIs for properties at schema.org)
- Re: Generating property URIs (Was: Re: URIs for properties at schema.org)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Generating property URIs (Was: Re: URIs for properties at schema.org)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
Friday, 14 October 2011
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Draft response to ISSUE-105: @itemref support
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multi-Lingual Pages (ACTION-1)
- Introduction
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
Thursday, 13 October 2011
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
Wednesday, 12 October 2011
- Re: Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Microdata to RDF: First Editor's Draft (ACTION-6)
- Fwd: More direct conversion from microdata to RDFa?
- Multiple itemtypes in microdata
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
Monday, 3 October 2011
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
Monday, 10 October 2011
- Re: RDFa 1.1 Lite (ACTION-8)
- Re: Mapping Microdata to RDF
- Re: RDFa 1.1 Lite (ACTION-8)
- Re: Mapping Microdata to RDF
- RDFa 1.1 Lite (ACTION-8)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Multiple types from different vocabularies (ACTION-7)
- Re: Mapping Microdata to RDF (Action-6)
- Re: Activity Summary
- Activity Summary
- Re: Mapping Microdata to RDF
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Mapping Microdata to RDF
Saturday, 8 October 2011
Friday, 7 October 2011
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Applying Postel's Law to HTML Data
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
Thursday, 6 October 2011
- Re: JSON serialization
- Re: Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Applying Postel's Law to HTML Data
- Re: Applying Postel's Law to HTML Data
- Presentation
- Re: Applying Postel's Law to HTML Data
Wednesday, 5 October 2011
Monday, 3 October 2011
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
- Re: Introduction
- Data blocks, not marked up content
- Data blocks, not marked up content
- Re: Microdata implied property order
- Belated Introduction
Monday, 3 October 2011
- Re: JSON serialization
- Re: JSON serialization
- Re: JSON serialization
- Re: JSON serialization
- Re: Multi-Lingual Pages
- Re: JSON serialization
- Re: Shared Properties
- Re: Multi-Lingual Pages