- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:56:00 +0000
- To: liam@w3.org
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, public-html-xml@w3.org
Thanks Liam, I have created the bug http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14881 Given lack of resources, if it would help to have the text written for you, let me know. If you tell me the source format for the spec I can match it. Good thinking about the XPath/XQuery support... Jeni On 19 Nov 2011, at 00:45, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 00:05 +0000, Jeni Tennison wrote: > >> I see XML Schema 1.1 [1] is at Candidate Recommendation stage. Is it >> too late to slip in a xs:timezone and a xs:gYearWeek? > > > As team contact for Schema, I'll note that > (1) we'd need implementation support. I think that's actually doable. > (2) we'd need clear spec. The HTML 5 spec is quite likely to be clear > enough. > (3) we'd need to know that the HTML 5 spec was stable in this area; > (4) we'd need test cases added to the test suite. > > Frankly, an RFC822-style date lexical format would be of huge benefit > too. > > Jeni, feel free to file a comment on Bugzilla against XSD 1.1 CR; I > can't promise anything will happen, because the Schema WG has very few > resources and is trying to move forward, and because going back to last > call isn't on the cards, but I also won't rule it out. > > If new types were to be added in the next two weeks, I can also imagine > us being able to put at least a placeholder into XQuery 3 and XPath 3 > before Last Call for XQuery 3 (and the XDM and serialization and > Functions and Operators), even if we didn't have all the details fleshed > out. > > Good catch. > > Liam > > > -- > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ > > > -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2011 09:56:28 UTC