- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:02:32 +0200
- To: HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
at, Nov 12, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > I've written up the issues with link relations in RDFa as I understand them at: > > http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML_Data_Improvements#Link_Relations > > Please take a look and let me know if I've missed anything. Why does RDFa want to interpret link relations as part of the RDF graph while not also importing <meta name=foo content=bar> into the graph? If it is about maximally importing HTML-native metadata into RDF, why isn't HTML-native <meta> data imported? If it's not about maximally importing HTML-native metadata, why bother with rel at all? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 11:03:11 UTC