W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-data-tf@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats)

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:02:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJQvAudCvvk-q6m=b+UoyuAef2Hq+UQtR7N4=n8zip5eeA4qYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
at, Nov 12, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
> I've written up the issues with link relations in RDFa as I understand them at:
>  http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML_Data_Improvements#Link_Relations
> Please take a look and let me know if I've missed anything.

Why does RDFa want to interpret link relations as part of the RDF
graph while not also importing <meta name=foo content=bar> into the
graph? If it is about maximally importing HTML-native metadata into
RDF, why isn't HTML-native <meta> data imported? If it's not about
maximally importing HTML-native metadata, why bother with rel at all?

Henri Sivonen
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 11:03:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:08:25 UTC