- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:48:56 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: "public-html-data-tf@w3.org" <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@tantek.com>
I have made use of RDFa properties as a hook both for CSS styling and for general CSS paths used in jQuery selectors, for example. An advantage for Microdata here is the use of full URLs for @itemtype, where RDFa's greater flexibility makes selecting on particular attribute values difficult. This can, of course, be mitigated as the author of the HTML+RDFa has a certain amount of control over the values used, and can take this into consideration when creating CSS selectors. For example, in the development of the Connected Media Experience, I would generate HTML using a vocabulary which allowed the use of simple tokens for classes and properties; for example, <div class="release" vocab="http://cme-spec.org/profile" about="" typeof="Album"> <h1 property="title">Album name</h1> <ol property="audioCollection" typeof="AudioCollection" inlist> <li rel="expression" typeof="Audio"> <h2 property="titile">Track name</h2> <a property="displayArtist" href="http://dbpedia.org/resource/ArtistName">Artist Name</a> <audio property="encoding" typeof="Encoding" src="http://path-to-encoding"/> </li> </ol> </div> Knowing the classes and properties used allows me to perform styling such as the following: [property='audioCollection'] audio[property='encoding'] { display:block; ... } Microdata has a bit of an advantage for people writing CSS selectors for content they don't control, at least for @itemtype matching. @itemprop is more complicated as either full URIs or tokens may be used. Gregg On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > This is a topic that is historically closest to the Microformats > community, via their use of the 'class' attribute (and via Tantek's > long-term CSSitude). My CSS knowledge is fairly stuck in the 90s > alongside my music tastes; hopefully Tantek, Hixie and others can > offer some perspective here. > > Has anyone looked in detail at the CSS styling aspect of choosing > between HTML data notations. If I want to style mentions of a > <http://schema.org/Volcano/> or a price or whatever, minimising > redundant markup, how does this affect my choice of HTML data syntax? > Is the CSS in super-modern browsers any more capable of hooking onto > Microdata patterns, RDFa (Lite/Full), or other idioms? How modern is > modern? What pragmatic tricks are needed / useful in practice, e.g. > hardcoding or coordinating namespace prefixes in site-wide CSS? How > does the notion of graceful degradation apply here? How does the > notion of namespace in > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-selectors-20110929/#attribute-selectors > fit in? How far does [property=~"http://example.com/] go towards > working with RDFa? > > cheers, > > Dan >
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 18:49:49 UTC