- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:06:25 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Oops, one small item I missed... On Dec 22, 2011, at 09:02 , Ivan Herman wrote: >> >> Also note that the microdata to RDF spec is written in an open-ended form, as we expected a working group to take positions on various issues, so we were trying to avoid doing that. If the TF is going to publish the document, we should probably take those positions in the draft. > > Yes, I agree. We should do that. And I think that our guidance should take into account that the single biggest usage of microdata, at this moment, is schema.org; ie, it should be possible to create a microdata->RDF mapping that handles schema.org it should be *easy* to create a microdata->RDF... (ideally, such mapping should be doable without a registry, or with some sort of a built in registry.) Ivan > vocabularies the same way as it would be encoded in RDFa Lite, so that to ensure interoperability on that level. ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 08:06:25 UTC