- From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 23:01:03 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv521 Modified Files: decision-policy-v2.html Log Message: There should be a way to disagree without escalating to an ISSUE http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12732 Index: decision-policy-v2.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html,v retrieving revision 1.24 retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -d -r1.24 -r1.25 --- decision-policy-v2.html 29 May 2011 22:29:29 -0000 1.24 +++ decision-policy-v2.html 29 May 2011 23:01:01 -0000 1.25 @@ -251,6 +251,12 @@ to move beyond the editor's response and get consideration from the full Working Group.</p></dd> +<dt>5.e. No, But Willing to Concede: Close Bug and mark Disagree</dt> +<dd>If the commenter is unsatisfied with the editor's response, but +does not wish to pursue the issue further by escalating or reopeneing, +the commenter should indicate that by changing the bug state to +CLOSED and add the Disagree keyword. <b>** This is an endpoint for the process. **</b></dd> + <dt>6. Working Group Decision</dt> <dd>Issues escalated to the tracker will be decided by Working Group Decision. The <a href="#escalation">Escalation Process</a> describes how Working Group decisions are made.</dd>
Received on Sunday, 29 May 2011 23:01:04 UTC